Search results

and application of Article 20.1 c) by the AEPD implies the exclusion of the weighting required by the legitimizing basis of Article 6.1.f) of the RGPD and

this processing could be based on the Article 6(1)(c) “compliance with a legal obligation” or Article 6(1)(e) GDPR “the performance of a task carried out

offered and / or concluded after July 1, 2016, articles L.211-1, L.212-3, L.212-1, L.241-1, R.212-1 / 1 °, L .111-1, L.111-2, L.111-3, L.221-5, L.221-6,

Justification 3.1.1. Regarding the purpose limitation findings (Article 5.1 b) GDPR) and the lawfulness of processing (Article 6.1 GDPR) 12. In its report

show_context_help(h) { newWindow = window.open(h,"Help", "menubar=1,toolbar=1,scrollbars=1,resizable=1,width=700, height=500"); } </SCRIPT><NOSCRIPT></NOSCRIPT><STYLE

there is no violation of articles 5.1(c), 5.1(d), 5.1(e) and 5.1(f). Articles 5.1(c), (d) and (f), 5.2, 12, 16, 24, 25, 30.1, 31, 32, 38.3 and 38.6 of the AVG

administrative bodies, researchers and physicians in violation of Article 32(1) GDPR. Uppsala regional authorities notified the Swedish DPA (Integritetsskyddsmyndigheten

with the terms of the decree of 29 May 2020, pursuant to Article 5-1-a) of the RGPD. Article 5(1)(a) of the Regulation stipulates that: personal data must

of this regulation and protect the rights of data subjects "(Article 25, paragraph 1, of GDPR). COMMENTS OF THE MISE In the note prot. n. XX of the XX century

(definition) Article 5.1 : Principles of data processing Article 5.1.a : Principle of legality, objectivity and transparency Article 5.1.b : Principle

stipulated by the labor court, § 15 GDPR. 1. According to Art. 99 (2) GDPR, the GDPR has been in force since May 25, 2018. It is directly applicable. According

basis under Article 6(1) GDPR. In light of this, the DPA issued a fine of €70,000 to másLUZ Energía (SIE) by virtue of Article 83(5) GDPR for unlawful

volition investigation into CP&A's compliance with Article 9, as well as Article 32 GDPR. Since Article 9 GDPR prohibits the processing of special categories

according to Article 8, Article 23. and paragraph 1 Article 25 Act no. 90/2018, cf. Article 5, paragraph 1 Article 24 and paragraph 1 Article 28 of regulation

Tre had violated the following articles of the GDPR: Articles 5(1), 5(2), 6(1)(a), 7, 12(1), 12(2), 24 and 25. It subsequently fined Wind Tre 16,729,600 EUR

functions assigned to the control authorities in the article 57.1 and the powers granted in article 58.1 of the Regulation (EU) C/ Jorge Juan, 6 www.aepd.es

been deleted by the employer upon request pursuant to Article 16, Article 17 and Article 5(1)(d) GDPR (inaccuracy of personal data). Therefore, the employer

Officer (DPO) under Section 4 of Chapter 4 of the GDPR (see in particular Article 37 GDPR to Article 39 GDPR). One of these audit proceedings concerned a Luxembourg

Datatilsynet hold that the Municipality of Odense infringed Article 12(3) GDPR and Article 15 GDPR due to delayed answers to access requests. The Datatilsynet

principle, namely the breaches of articles 5-1-c), 5 -1 e), 13, 32 and 35-1 of the GDPR; no breach of Article 6 of the GDPR and of Directive 2002/58 / EC of the