Search results

violation of the articles: -6.1 of the GDPR, in accordance with article 83.5.a) of the GDPR and article 72.1.b) of the LOPDGDD. C/ Jorge Juan, 6 www.aepd.es 28001

Articles 32 to 36 GDPR, including those regarding the notification of personal data breaches. In particular, pursuant to Article 33(2) GDPR in the event of

fine, the criteria specified in the same Article 83." 112. Under Article 83 of the GDPR, as referred to in Article 20(III) of the Data Protection Act: "1

contravene Articles 13(1), 6(1)(a) and 8 GDPR? The AEPD found that GRUP BC S.L violated Article 13(1), 6(1)(a) and 8 GDPR. Share your comments here! Share blogs

the controller was in breach of Article 33(1) GDPR, Article 33(3) GDPR, Articles 34(1) and 34(2) GDPR, and Article 5(2) GDPR, Firstly, the Polish DPA held

the Foundation. The DPA held that the Foundation violated Article 33(1), Article 34(1) GDPR by failing to notify the DPA of a personal data protection

search the following urls: 1. *** URL.1 2. *** URL.2 3. *** URL.3 SECOND: In accordance with article 65.4 of the LOPDGDD, which has provided for a mechanism

under Article 34 GDPR or the data protection supervisory authority under Article 33 GDPR because the requirements of the legal definition in Article 4(12)

proceedings claimed on the basis of Article 1019h DCCP. GDPR Are the IP addresses personal data? Yes 3.3. Article 4 of the GDPR defines personal data as: “any

(1)(c) and (1)(e) of Article 6 GDPR. The violation of Article 2-ter of the Code is a direct consequence of the violation of Articles 5 and 6 GDPR. Finally

Unfulfilled obligation of article 5.1 f) of the GDPR C/ Jorge Juan, 6 www.aepd.es 28001 – Madrid sedeagpd.gob.es 19/33 Article 5.1 of the GDPR establishes the principles

which the person responsible is subject. In contrast to Article 6 (1) (b) GDPR, Article 6 (1) (c) GDPR with “legal obligation” does not mean a contractual

should have notified the DPA under Article 33(1) GDPR and the data subjects affected by the breach under Article 34(1) GDPR. Regarding the corrective measure

Consequently, they did not adhere to Article 33(5) GDPR, nor Article 33(1). The Norwegian DPA held that Trumf had breached Article 33(1) for failing to notify them

the GDPR introduces a prohibition on their processing (Article 9(1) GDPR), while allowing for explicit and limitative exceptions (Article 9(2) GDPR). In

interests in accordance with the provisions from article 5-bis "(article 5, paragraph 2, of legislative decree no. 33/2013). In relation to the profiles of competence

33(3)(b), Article 33(3)(c), and Article 33(3)(d), as Article 34(2) GDPR prescribes. Therefore, the DPA decided to impose an administrative fine pursuant to

interfering with court decisions. The DPA found a breach of Article 33 GDPR and Article 34(1) and (2) GDPR resulting in a fine of €2,324. Share your comments here

logically been taken up in Article 5(1)(b) of the GDPR under the Principles relating to the processing of personal data (Chapter II). Article 5(1)(b) of the RGPD

with Article 5 (1) (a) and Article 6 (1) (f) GDPR. Thus, the controller failed to comply with the accountability principle under Article 5 (2) GDPR. Second