Search results

concerns Article 9 AVG instead of Article 10 AVG and Article 9 AVG does not apply to criminal personal data (see legal ground 4.23 and MvT to Article 22 UAVG)

pursuant to art. 35 of the Regulation. an impact assessment pursuant to art. 35 of the Regulation. an impact assessment pursuant to art. 35 of the Regulation

behalf of the controller, violating Article 27(4) GDPR. The DPA confirmed that the controller violated Article 35 GDPR for not having carried out a DPIA

data subject. The court also concluded that Article 79 GDPR and Article 35 of the Dutch Act implementing the GDPR (UAVG) provide the data subject with access

that the GDPR applies to the request for removal. The request shall be based on Article 21 in conjunction with Article 79 of the GDPR and Article 35(2) of

ofcontroller (article 4.7 of the GDPR), the scope of the GDPR (article3.1 of the GDPR), the right to erasure (article 17 of the GDPR) and its powers (article 58.2of

meaning of Article 4 No. 7 GDPR. However, the defendant cannot be accused of violating an obligation to provide information under Art. 15, 12 GDPR. Paragraph

montant de 10.000 € (article 83, paragraphe 2, de l'AVG ; article 100, §1, 13° WOG et article 101 WOG). 129. Compte tenu de l'article 83 AVG et de la jurisprudence17

emphasised: None of the personal data concerned information covered by Article 9 or 10 GDPR. The data subject was interviewed as part of his role in the business

observations. Firstly, the right to be forgotten can be found in Article 17 GDPR and Article 93 of the LOPDGDD, the Spanish data protection law. It establishes

the ePrivacy Directive and Articles 6(1)(a) and 7 GDPR, in the lights of Article 4(11) and Recital 32 GDPR. Following this report, the GBA issued a decision

obligations related to the processing operations pursuant to Article 5(1)(a) GDPR and Article 14(5)(b) GDPR. In that case, the DPA recommended that the information

hereinafter: GDPR), OJ L 119, 4 May 2016, p. 1.: Article 4, Article 5 Paragraph 1 Letter c, Article 6, Article 12 Paragraph 3, Article 51 Paragraph 1

should have passed as per Article 12(3) GDPR. The plaintiffs have a right to filed a complaint before a court as per Article 35 GDPR. On that matter, the court

consulted before processing, pursuant to Article 36 GDPR. Fourth, the Court noted that, pursuant to Article 10 GDPR and Article 31 Implementation Act, the IP addresses

conformity with the data subject’s rights of information under Article 13 GDPR and Article 14 GDPR, the hospital should firstly make clear what the legal basis

Appeal considered Article 35(2) of the Implementing Act of the GDPR (UAVG), which follows from the right to object, Article 21 GDPR. Article 35(2) UAVG stipulates

violation of Article 35 GDPR. Thus, the DPA fined the university a total of €200,000 for the violation of Articles. 5(1)(a), (c) and (e), 6, 9, 13, 25, 35, 44 and

the alert on the SIS system under Article 17(1)(d) GDPR. The reason for the data subject invoking the GDPR is that Article 53(1) Regulation (EU) 2018/1861

processing, in violation of Article 32 GDPR, and failed to undertake a data protection impact assessment, in violation of Article 35. For the above reasons