Search results

with Article 5 (1) (a) and Article 6 (1) (f) GDPR. Thus, the controller failed to comply with the accountability principle under Article 5 (2) GDPR. Second

contain at least the information and measures referred to in Art. 33 paragraph 3 it. b), c) and d) of Regulation 2016/679, i.e .: a) the name and contact

violations (Article 33 of Regulation 2016/679), procedures for reporting data protection breaches to the supervisory authority (Article 33 (3) of Regulation

the request - thereby infringing Article 12(3) of the GDPR, as well as 11 §3, 11/1 §3, 11/2 §3 and 11/3 §3 of the Act of 3 August 2012. With regard to the

meaning of Article 5.1.c. AVG). 13. The transcript of the hearing is subsequently transmitted to the parties on 28 June 2023; in accordance with Article 54 of

the Junta de Extremadura. It adds that the representative of B.B.B. and C.C.C. Is daughter of both, and that the “mayor's office has already granted the

on Article 6(1)(b) GDPR, as the disclosure was not necessary for the performance of the telecommunication contract. Concerning Article 6(1)(f) GDPR, the

of Bologna for violation of Articles 5(2)(f) and 9 GDPR. On the basis of Articles 58(2)(i) and 83 GDPR, the Garante imposed a fine of € 18 000 on the Local

edition 2020, GDPR Art. 33 para. 81 acc. Art. 33 Para. I S. I GDPR, in the event of a violation of the protection of personal data, the person responsible

recognized as personal data - it was not required to notify anyone (Article 33 (1) and Article 34 (3) (a) and (b)). ) ”Of Regulation 2016/2019. In addition, the

images to Instagram are: A.A.A., born 07/25/2005. B.B.B., born on 05/02/2006 C.C.C., born 11/19/2005 2. That, according to the Judicial Police, the video published

notified in accordance with Article 34 GDPR. Therefore, the DPA found that the controller violated Article 33(1) and Article 34(1) GDPR and imposed a fine of

2, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3

hereinafter: GDPR), OJ L 119, 4 May 2016, p. 1.: Article 4, Article 5 Paragraph 1 Letter c, Article 6, Article 12 Paragraph 3, Article 51 Paragraph 1

the light of Article 13 of the AVG. In this respect, the Inspectorate refers to column 3 of the table below.3 Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Privacy policy

the breach, pursuant to the obligation expressed in Article 34 GDPR, in conjunction with Article 12 GDPR. Based on this assessment, the DPA issued an administrative

complaint lodged under Article 77 of the GDPR, or proceedings based on Article 78(1) of the GDPR, is not precluded by the GDPR or any other provision of

Protection Regulation. 3.2.3. Technical and organizational measures 3.2.3.1. Security of the patient information system 26.11.2017–13.3.2019 According to the

controller violated Article 33(1) GDPR by not notifying the DPA of the data breach. Consequently, the DPA issued a fine of approximately €3,492 (16,000 PLN)

applicable (cf. Article 99(1) and (3) AVG). As of that date, the AVG is binding and directly applicable in every Member State (Article 99(3) AVG), i.e.: irrespective