Search results

the request - thereby infringing Article 12(3) of the GDPR, as well as 11 §3, 11/1 §3, 11/2 §3 and 11/3 §3 of the Act of 3 August 2012. With regard to the

Personal Data Protection Office (Article 33(1) and (3) of Regulation 2016/679) and the persons affected by the infringement (Article 34(1) and (2) of Regulation

of Bologna for violation of Articles 5(2)(f) and 9 GDPR. On the basis of Articles 58(2)(i) and 83 GDPR, the Garante imposed a fine of € 18 000 on the Local

images to Instagram are: A.A.A., born 07/25/2005. B.B.B., born on 05/02/2006 C.C.C., born 11/19/2005 2. That, according to the Judicial Police, the video published

on Article 6(1)(b) GDPR, as the disclosure was not necessary for the performance of the telecommunication contract. Concerning Article 6(1)(f) GDPR, the

edition 2020, GDPR Art. 33 para. 81 acc. Art. 33 Para. I S. I GDPR, in the event of a violation of the protection of personal data, the person responsible

recognized as personal data - it was not required to notify anyone (Article 33 (1) and Article 34 (3) (a) and (b)). ) ”Of Regulation 2016/2019. In addition, the

obligation under Article 6(1)(c) GDPR. Therefore, the controller processed this data without a legal basis violating Article 5(1)(a) and 6(1) GDPR. Secondly,

2, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3

notified in accordance with Article 34 GDPR. Therefore, the DPA found that the controller violated Article 33(1) and Article 34(1) GDPR and imposed a fine of

the light of Article 13 of the AVG. In this respect, the Inspectorate refers to column 3 of the table below.3 Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Privacy policy

complaint lodged under Article 77 of the GDPR, or proceedings based on Article 78(1) of the GDPR, is not precluded by the GDPR or any other provision of

hereinafter: GDPR), OJ L 119, 4 May 2016, p. 1.: Article 4, Article 5 Paragraph 1 Letter c, Article 6, Article 12 Paragraph 3, Article 51 Paragraph 1

applicable (cf. Article 99(1) and (3) AVG). As of that date, the AVG is binding and directly applicable in every Member State (Article 99(3) AVG), i.e.: irrespective

payment to be appropriate. 3. Findings 3.1 Findings prior to the on-site visit of 18 June 2018 Menzis sent documents to the AP on 3 and 29 May 2018 to demonstrate

of Articles 6(1) and 5(2) GDPR. Furthermore, the DPA found a violation of Article 12(1) in combination with Article 13 GDPR since the controller did not

Fundamental Rights (Article 8 (1) in conjunction with Article 8 (3) CFR) is protected by Article 77 (1) GDPR in conjunction with Article 77 (1) CFR. Art.

the breach, pursuant to the obligation expressed in Article 34 GDPR, in conjunction with Article 12 GDPR. Based on this assessment, the DPA issued an administrative

Protection Regulation. 3.2.3. Technical and organizational measures 3.2.3.1. Security of the patient information system 26.11.2017–13.3.2019 According to the

controller violated Article 33(1) GDPR by not notifying the DPA of the data breach. Consequently, the DPA issued a fine of approximately €3,492 (16,000 PLN)