Search results

theRundfunk etc. , C-465/00, C-138/01 and C-139/01, EU: C: 2003: 294, paragraph 65, and of 1 May 2014, GoogleSpain and Googie. C-131/12, EU: C: 2014: 317, paragraph

Officer (DPO) under Section 4 of Chapter 4 of the GDPR (see in particular Article 37 GDPR to Article 39 GDPR). One of these audit proceedings concerned a Luxembourg

deadline set out in Article 33(1) GDPR. 6. Datatilsynet’s Assessment 6.1. Findings of an Infringement of Article 33(1) GDPR 6.1.1. Introduction As noted

requirements of Article 6(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 7 GDPR, which cannot be superseded by relying on Article 6(1)(b) GDPR? Is Article 5(1)(c) GDPR (data

found that GDPR does not prevent the claimant from exercising their basic right. In this regard the court referred to Article 6(1)(f) GDPR to highlight

violations of Article 5.1.f) of the GDPR, typified in Article 83.5 of the GDPR and of Article 32 of the GDPR, typified in Article 83.4 of the GDPR. In order

B.B.B., with NIF ***NIF.1, for an infraction of Article 5.1.c) of the RGPD, typified in Article 83.5 of the RGPD, a fine of €1,500 (one thousand five hundred

Articles 6(1)(b), 5(1)(b) and 5(1)(c) GDPR? The Spanish DPA (AEPD) deemed itself competent under Article 58(2) GDPR in conjunction with Article 47 of the

principle, namely the breaches of articles 5-1-c), 5 -1 e), 13, 32 and 35-1 of the GDPR; no breach of Article 6 of the GDPR and of Directive 2002/58 / EC of the

This behaviour was in violation of Article 31 GDPR. Thirdly, Company B was found to be in violation of Article 32(1) GDPR. This provision imposes an obligation

October 2022. 18See Art. 60(6) GDPR. 3 4. Legal Background 4.1. Scope of Application of the GDPR Under Article 2(1) GDPR, the Regulation: “[…] applies to

to injunctive relief from § 29 para. 1 sentence 1 no. 2 BDSG old version, but from § 29 para. 1 sentence 1 no. 1 BDSG old version, although the "basic

addresses that the Medical List does today, cf. GDPR Article 4, No. 11, Article 6 No. 1 letter a, Article 7 and Article 9 No. 2 letter a If current practice is

section 2 of article 8 when required to do so by the authority or its agents, for the fulfillment of the purposes set forth in section 1 of article 16. You

with the criteria established in Article 83(2)(b) GDPR: negligent character of the infringement, and Article 83(2)(g) GDPR: categories of personal data affected

lawfulness: (1) the consent of the 10 complainant (article 6.1 a) of the GDPR combined with article 7 of the GDPR), (2) article 6.1 c) of the GDPR in that the

is classified in article 83.5.e) of the RGPD, which considers as such: “no provide access in breach of Article 58(1).” The same article establishes that

of the article 5.1.f) of the RGPD, typified in article 83.5 of the RGPD, considered very serious for the purposes of prescription in article 72.1.i) of

treatment is based in accordance with Article 6(1)(a) or Article 9(2)(a) and this is not based on another legal basis; c) the data subject objects to the processing

Finnish DPA found a retail chain to have breached Article 5(1)(e) GDPR, Article 25(1) GDPR and Article 25(2) GDPR for its lengthy storage of purchase behaviour