Search results

data are part of a filing system, in line with Article 2(1) GDPR. Article 4(6) GDPR defines a filing system as "any structured set of personal data, which

did not react either. GDPR applicable? (Article 3(2) GDPR) The DPA held that the GDPR was applicable pursuant of Article 3(2) GDPR. Because the controller

imposed a fine of €5,000 for the violation of Article 13 GDPR. With regard to the appointment of a DPO, the DPA recalled that Article 37(1)(b) GDPR provides

personal data of data subjects guaranteed by Article 44 GDPR and consequently breached Article 44 GDPR. The DPA issued a fine of 300,000 SEK (approx. €25,000)

in breach of Article 5, Article 6, Article 8, Article 9, and Article 25 GDPR. Consequently, the DPA urgently imposed upon the controller a temporary limitation

on which the processing is based pursuant to point (a) of Article 6(1) or point (a) of Article 9(2) and there is no other legal basis for the processing

prove compliance with Article 5(2) GDPR. The DSB then ascertained whether the controller could lawfully rely on Article 6(1)(f) GDPR as a legal basis, which

that such a mistake of manipulation, the if applicable, constitutes a security breach and as such a data breach within the meaning of Article 4.12 of the

complete information by means of a link to this information. This was a violation of Article 12. Based on Article 13(2)(a) GDPR and WP29 guidelines on transparency

stroke a balance between freedom of information and right to privacy. Health data are sensitive data covered by Article 9 GDPR. According to Article 137 of

provided for in Article 56(1), read in conjunction with Article 56(2), read in conjunction with Article 56(3), read in conjunction with Article 56(4), read

Chapter 2 § 6 in the Instrument of Government. The right to free speech is secured in Chapter 2 § 1 in the Instrument of Government and Chapter 2 § 1 of

breaching Article 6(1) GDPR, and required the company to implement a policy for conducting credit ratings per Article 24 GDPR. A person lodged a complaint

infringement of Article 5.1 c) AVG has been proven. f)Transparent information (Article 5.1(a); Article 12.1. and Article 13.1. and 13.2. AVG) 43.The complainant

to provide as evidence a recording of a call where the caller is identified as A.A.A., provides the contact email ***EMAIL.2 and a meter reading is provided

alleged violation of Article 5.1.f) of the RGPD and Article 32 of the GDPR, typified in Article 83.5 of the GDPR and Article 83.4 of the GDPR. C/ Jorge Juan

52(1), Article 54(2) and Article 82(2) GDPR. Most importantly, the controller challenged two of the three findings of the DPA, which had led to the fine: the

...................... .11 2.2.1 Applicable regulations, etc. ................................................ ...11 2.2.2 The Privacy Protection Authority's

to data portability ; (c) where the processing is based on Article 6(1)(a) or Article 9(2)(a), the existence of the right to withdraw consent at any time

violated Article 21 GDPR due to unsolicited political propaganda sent after the data subject exercised his right to object. A citizen sent a letter to