Search results
From GDPRhub
- Apple. Did the provider violate Article 82 of the Data Protection Act? The DPA explained that Article 82 of the Data Protection Act required the provider82 KB (13,463 words) - 17:03, 6 December 2023
- paragraph. 1 point 1 and sec. 3 of the Act of May 10, 2018 on the Protection of Personal Data (Journal of Laws of 2019, item 1781) and art. 57 sec. 1 lit60 KB (9,755 words) - 09:58, 17 November 2023
- admission for processing of the claims that are made before the AEPD, provided for in article 65.4 of the Law Organic 3/2018, of December 5, Protection of Personal62 KB (9,703 words) - 13:05, 13 December 2023
- PROCEDURE The procedure instructed by the Spanish Data Protection Agency and based on the following FIRST: On 3/08/2018, the Catalan Data Protection Authority25 KB (3,933 words) - 14:37, 13 December 2023
- €120,000) And sixth, the categories of personal data affected by the infringement, which in this case, as previously remarked, were personal data of a sensitive270 KB (43,335 words) - 12:39, 13 December 2023
- APD/GBA (Belgium) - 149/2023 (redirect from APD/GBA (Belgium) - DOS-2020-05649 and DOS-2021-05271) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of April 27, 2016 relating to the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal113 KB (17,325 words) - 08:50, 19 March 2024
- phone calls, the controller should inform the data subject of its identity and its representative, the purpose of the processing, and it should not conceal54 KB (8,916 words) - 15:22, 22 February 2022
- Garante per la protezione dei dati personali (Italy) - 9779057 (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)Parliament and of the Council, of 27 April 2016, concerning the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data, as well as the free63 KB (9,916 words) - 11:28, 16 August 2022
- Law 3/2018, of 5 December, Protection of Personal Data and guarantee of digital rights (in hereinafter LOPDGDD), said claim was transferred to the claimed32 KB (4,952 words) - 13:11, 13 December 2023
- prove "the authorshhip of the alleged theft" or that the former Secretary and Vice President had made use of the personal data contained in the missing files27 KB (4,243 words) - 14:06, 13 December 2023
- privacy policy, the issue is not the data controller’s allegedly illegal processing of personal data as a result of the privacy policy but rather an issue relating422 KB (70,184 words) - 13:56, 13 December 2023
- Rb. Gelderland - AWB - 18 3073 (category 2018) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)Article 49, first and second paragraphs of the Personal Data Protection Act (Wbp). By decision of 13 March 2018, the defendant rejected the application. By10 KB (1,424 words) - 12:09, 9 May 2022
- with article 65.4 of Organic Law 3/2018, of 5 December, Protection of Personal Data and guarantee of digital rights (in forward LOPDGDD), said claim was75 KB (12,421 words) - 13:23, 13 December 2023
- facts of the case and the state of the dispute and the motions of fact at first instance - most recently adjusted to the notice of the Regional Court in143 KB (24,273 words) - 15:59, 10 March 2022
- rejected the appeal and fully upheld the decision by the DSB. On the issue of storage duration of the data on payment defaults, the BVwG agreed with the DSB's32 KB (5,232 words) - 09:40, 10 September 2021
- above, and that the mere activation of the audio recording implied the collection and processing of the data subject's voice, i.e., their personal data. Therefore74 KB (11,726 words) - 13:02, 13 December 2023
- does not address the processing of data) collect and process personal data of a data subject without complying with general data protection principles such127 KB (21,484 words) - 17:01, 12 December 2023
- objected to the processing of the requested data. At the request of the Applicant, the Authority shall take the following decisions in the data protection authority58 KB (9,413 words) - 10:11, 17 November 2023
- respond to the claims of the claimant, who did not mention ex- The name of the Mayor was expressly displayed on the B.B.B. website, and not on the of the townhall43 KB (7,001 words) - 13:56, 13 December 2023
- not determine the purposes and means of the processing of personal data on the mayor's Facebook page. As such, the DPA declared that the City Council was40 KB (6,508 words) - 14:39, 13 December 2023