Search results

5(1)(f) GDPR and a fine of €100,000 for the violation of Article 37 GDPR. The DPA issued a reprimand for the violations of Article 5(1)(e) GDPR and Article

point b) GDPR and Article 100, §1, 5 ° WOG to be reprimanded for the infringement of Article 25 (1) GDPR; b. on the basis of Article 83 GDPR and Articles

Adopted 13 GDPR for processing on foot of Article 6(1)(b) GDPR . The IE recalls the general requirement of transparencyunder Article5(a)GDPR 54,anditsp

applicants' rights. Consequently, the Ministry violated Article 32 GDPR and Article 24 GDPR. The DPA also found that visa applicants were insufficiently informed

Court of Stuttgart points out that the absence of information of Article 13 GDPR constitutes an unfair trade-based action as understood by § 3 of the national

2022, Art. 82 GDPR marginal number 14). With regard to recital 146 sentence 1 of the GDPR, however, processing must have violated the GDPR (Nemitz, in:

purpose to process special categories of data according to Article 9 (1) GDPR is not proportional and necessary, as there are less restrictive measures

(Article 5(2) GDPR), of engagement of a processor (Article 28 GDPR), and in respect of the security of processing of personal data (Article 32 GDPR). However

29; judgment of 29 July 2019, Pelham and others, C-476/17, EU:C:2019:624, recital 80 et seq.), the level of protection afforded by the Charter does not regularly

processing of personal data (recital 38 of the GDPR preamble). Moreover, referring to the wording of recitals 10 and 45 of the GDPR, the supervisory authority

accountability pursuant to Article 5(2) UK GDPR because it failed to demonstrate compliance with Article 5(1)(a) and (c) UK GDPR principles of lawfulness, fairness

of 1 February 2020], Art. 4 GDPR marginal no. 125; Buchner/Kühling in Kühling/Buchner, DS-GVO BDSG, 2nd edition, Art. 4 GDPR marginal no. 8). In substance

member states is superimposed (see Recital 146 S 4 and 5 on the GDPR; cf. also Frenzel in Paal / Pauly, GDPR-BDSG3 Art 82 GDPR margin no.1; Wybitul / Haß / Albrecht

12(5)(1) GDPR apply. However, it leaves open whether the material scope of application of the GDPR is opened or not opened due to Article 2(2)(a) GDPR. In any

under Article 80(1) GDPR and Article 80(2) GDPR. Also, the court clarified, making reference to CJEU case C-319/20, that Article 80(2) GDPR does not presuppose

10. Recital 32 of the GDPR materially states that "When the processing has multiple purposes, consent should be given for all of them". Recital 42 materially

performance of a contract (Article 6(1)(b) GDPR) and for legitimate interest (Article 6(1)(f) GDPR). Article 6(1)(b) GDPR In its original draft decision, the

persuasive weight.   82.  Recital 24 of the GDPR is relevant to the construction of Article 3(2)(b) GDPR and Article 3(2)(b) UK GDPR, this reads as follows:

with the requirements of Articles 13 and 14 of the GDPR? In relation to Article 13 and 14 of the GDPR, the AEPD held that the information CaixaBank provided

4(1) GDPR. Moreover, OLG Celle also held that a singular access request can never be excessive for the purposes of Article 12(5) GDPR as the GDPR only