Search results

LGT, in relation to article 21 of the RGPD, and article 23.4 of the LOPDGDD, already that the claimant received on August 21, 2019 at 7:08 p.m. from C /

entity, on 05/28/21, through the SICER service, it was received Appointed at destination on 06/04/21 by D. A.A.A.; ***NIF.1. THIRD: On 09/09/21, this Agency

and form to this body. FIFTH: Consulted the database of this AEPD on 01/10/21 there is no record any allegation in this regard, nor has the legality of

on 11/03/21 through the SICER service, was delivered at destination, on 11/10/21, being the receiver, Mr. B.B.B.. ***NIF.2. FIFTH: On 12/15/21, this Agency

the alleged violations of article 21.1 of the LSSI, classified as “mild” in art. 38.4.d) of said regulation and article 21 of the RGPD, typified in article

Information Society and Electronic Commerce (LSSI), and based on the following: BACKGROUND FIRST: On 01/15/21, a letter from claim of the complaining party

determined that no LSSI violations could be found in this case because its statute of limitations had been exceeded. Pursuant to Article 45 LSSI, very serious

violation of the LSSI, a request for correction would have been more sufficient to obtain the correction of the alleged situation contrary to the LSSI but, in the

Protection Agency and in based on the following: BACKGROUND FIRST: On 12/21/21, Ms. A.A.A. (hereinafter, the complaining party) filed claim before the Spanish

following: FACTS FIRST: Don A.A.A. (hereinafter, the claiming party), dated August 21, 2020, filed a claim with the Spanish Agency for Data Protection. The The

infringing Article 22 of the Spanish Law implementing the e-Privacy Directive (LSSI), for not properly informing the users about the use of cookies and for placing

on the following ACTS FIRST: A.A.A. (hereinafter, the claimant) dated April 21, 2020 filed a claim with the Spanish Agency for Data Protection. The claim

gob.es 2/13 That, according to the claimant, the events took place on August 21, 2019. And attach the following documentation:  Invoice from Orange, the

the data processor, Vamavi Phone SL, had violated Article 48(1) LGT, Article 21 GDPR in link with Article 23 LOPDGDD and Article 28 GDPR by making a commercial

the complained party dated July 15, 2020. - Request made by email dated July 21, 2020 for termination of issuance of invoices and communications. - Response

communications. The sending of advertising emails is regulated in article 21 of the LSSI, which establishes: "one. The sending of advertising or promotional

Director of the Spanish Agency for Data Protection >> SECOND: On December 21, 2020, the defendant has proceeded to pay the sanction in the amount of 54

no no this. You can tell TINDER that you had a conversation with me between 21 and 22/08 E.E.E .: The conversation seemed false to me and I deleted it. On

Martí Director of the Spanish Agency for Data Protection >> SECOND: On June 21, 2021, the claimed party has proceeded to pay the sanction in the amount of

claim on 11/21/2019: Well, the truth and truth is that Play has never been notified ORENES SL any claim, and only on the date indicated (11/21/2019) we were