Search results

of such processing (see Article 5(1)(b) GDPR), the requirement to have a legitimate basis laid down by law (see Article 6(1) GDPR), the right to access and

request (Article 61(5) GDPR), the requesting SA may adopt a provisional measure on the territory of its Member State under Article 55(1) GDPR. If the SA

this purpose (Article 52(4)(5)(6) GDPR). Elements of SAs' complete independence are also addressed in Article 53 GDPR and Article 54 GDPR. The CJEU in the

the SAs' tasks, please refer to Article 57 GDPR and for their powers please refer to Article 58 GDPR. See Recital 122 GDPR. In this respect, reference should

767f2?version=1.0 https://www.garanteprivacy.it/documents/10160/0/Bilancio+di+previsione+2019+-+Sintetico.xlsx/700e5df5-f7c3-6510-1bd5-ef90e9824f17?version=1

interests under Article 6(1)(f) GDPR. On the erasure obligations under Article 17 GDPR, the CJEU held that under Article 17(1)(d) GDPR SCHUFA will be under

meaning of Article 6(1)(f) of the GDPR must already be known in order for a balancing of interests within the meaning of Article 6(1)(f) of the GDPR to be possible

at/dam/jcr:ee7b155a-0a1f-4d00-98e9-902314c7022d/Datenschutzbericht%202022.pdf Report: Europe’s governments are failing the GDPR by Brave, page 6 - https://brave

personal data under Article 9(1) GDPR. Their processing would require the data subjects' explicit consent under Article 9(2)(a) GDPR and § 151(4) GewO,

other two conditions of Article 6 (1) (f) of the GDPR are not met. (26) The second condition of Article 6 (1) (f) of the GDPR is that the processing of

compliance with the principles of Article 5 GDPR and that they could be based on the legal basis of Article 6(1)(f) GDPR. The BVwG ruled that the principle

accordance with the provisions of Article 6(1)(c), Article 6(1)(f) GDPR, or both provisions? 2.     Does the answer to Question 1 mean: a)      that the person

in the same article 83. 111. Article 83 of the GDPR, as referred to in Article 20, paragraph III, of the Data Protection Act, provides: 1. Each supervisory

presenting the principles of data processing of Article 5(1) GDPR, underlined that, based on Article 5(2) GDPR, it is the data processor's responsibility to

the personal data to be provided pursuant to Article 15(1) of the GDPR, Article 15(3) sentence 1 of the GDPR must be interpreted as meaning that, due to

objected to its processing pursuant to Article 21(1) of the GDPR (Article 17(1)(a), (c)(1) and (d) of the GDPR). A request for erasure would therefore

assert or defend legal claims ». Article 17 of the GDPR regulates the right to deletion. Article 17 (1) (c) states: «1. The data subject shall have the

specific categories of information in Article 8 (1) and (5) of Directive 95/46 or in Article 9 (1), Article 10 (1) and Article 10 of Regulation 2016/679, the

Art. 44 GDPR is dismissed. Legal basis: Art. 4 (1), (2), (7) and (8), Art. 5, Art. 44, Art. 46 (1) and (2) (c), Art. 51 (1), Art. 57 (1) (d) and (f), Art

pursuant to Article 17(1)(d) GDPR since the data was unlawfully processed. The defendant claimed that its activities fall under exception in (Article 85 GDPR)