Search results

the provisions can be perceived in isolation from each other (6 Ob 140/06s mwN). In this sense, Clause 14 contains three independent provisions, on the

as a punishment (see VwGH 22.5.2019, Ra 2018/04/0074, 0075, marginal no. 9, mwN). As explained in the legislative materials on the DPA, Federal Law Gazette

( see mwN BVwG 12.03.2020, GZ: W256 2223922-1).” several criminal offenses were committed and also referred to the English language version see mwN BVwG

VStG applies (cf. mwN BVwG March 12, 2020, GZ: W256 2223922-1). according to paragraph 22, paragraph 2, VStG for application see mwN BVwG March 12, 2020

( see mwN BVwG 12.03.2020, GZ: W256 2223922-1).” several criminal offenses were committed and also referred to the English language version see mwN BVwG

judgment of 24 November 2010 - 1 BvF 2/05 -, BVerfGE 128, 1-90, Rn. 150 ff. mwN) to procedural prohibitions on exploitation to lead: 28 For the legal situation

of residual debt], paragraphs 74 and 75, mwN; see also VwGH October 31, 2023, Ro 2020/04/0024, 0025, Rn. 22, mwN). 24 In this case, the party involved makes

December 15, 2022 Ra 2020/08/0116 and VwGH of January 14, 2013, 2012/08/0299, mwN ). According to the established case law of the Administrative Court, when

involved (cf. Bayerischer VGH, decision of 02.26.2007 - 1 ZB 06.2296 -, juris mwN ). In the order at issue it only states that it is ordered to refrain from

respective case must be taken into account (see VwGH June 25, 2019 Ra 2018/10/0120 mwN). The assessment of the effectiveness of a procedural act, here the issuance

qualified as immaterial damage (cf. Ehmann in Ehmann/Selmayr. GDPR Art. 15 Rn. 1 mwN, Bäcker in Kühling/Buchner, GDPR Art. 5 Rn. 1). 74Due to the delayed information

2015, Ra 2015/22/0040, as well as 09/16/2015, Ra 2015/22/0082 to 0084, all mwN). The Federal Administrative Court is therefore barred from making a substantive

meaning of Art. 9 GDPR (cf. DSB of June 7, 2018, GZ DSB-D202.207/0001-DSB/2018, mwN). Paragraph 7, DSG standardizes data processing for archiving purposes in

compensation (Schaffland / Wiltfang, Art. 82 GDPR No. 5; Plath, Art. 82 GDPR No. 4 d mwN). On the one hand, a serious violation of personal rights is no longer necessary

Berlin-Brandenburg, decision of August 11, 2006 - OVG 8 S 50.06 -, juris marginal no. 16 mwN). 15 Based on these principles, the applicants have not made a claim to an

Der Schutz der Datenschutz in der Europäische Datenverarbeitung [2014 ] 463 mwN). Based on this, the right to erasure cannot be violated by a complete erasure

41160, Rn. 18; Uv 8.8.2019 - AN 14 K 19.00272 - BeckRS 2019, 30069, Rn. 28 mwN) because of Section 20 (5) No. 2 BDSG, the State Office for Data Protection

of a settlement surplus value (LAG Nürnberg 24.02.2016 - 4 Ta 16/16 juris mwN). The value of the subject matter of the appeal exceeds € 200. The appeal

the contested decision (cf. VwGH 17.12.2014, Ro 2014/03/0066, point V.1., mwN) and the position as a co-participant requires legally protected interests

2015, Ra 2015/22/0040, as well as 16.09.2015, Ra 2015/22/0082 to 0084, all mwN). The Federal Administrative Court is therefore precluded from making a substantive