Search results

obtained from them, as required under Article 14(1)(a) AVG and Article 14(2)(c)(e) and point (f) AVG; c. article 12 j° article 14 AVG, in view of the defendant

portability; (c) where the processing is based on Article 6(1)(a) or on Article 9, (c) where the processing is based on Article 6(1)(a) or Article 9(2)(a),

investigative actions. In light of provisions (Article 4 (15) GDPR, Article 9 GDPR, Article 6 GDPR) the vaccination of a person against Covid-19 implies the

Vodafone processed personal data without a legal basis according to Article 6(1) GDPR. The complainant has been a victim of identity theft with the data

health data, recorded in copies Article 6 (1) of the GDPR and, in the case of health data, Article 9 of the GDPR. Article 1 (1); (3) did not provide clear

obligations under Article 5(1)(f) and Article 32 of GDPR. Article 5 (1) : Ticketmaster has failed to comply with the requirements of GDPR including to process

the data subjects, therefore breaching Article 6 GDPR, as well as Article 5(1)(b) GDPR. Thirdly, Article 30 GDPR stipulates that the controller must keep

the UK-GDPR and the Data Protection Act 2018. c. A declaration that by processing the claimant’s personal data the defendant has breached Article 5(1) of

compliance with the data minimisation principle laid down in Article 5(1)(c) of the GDPR. 33. In addition, personal data concerning health will be processed

claimed party, for the alleged violation of Article 5.1.c) of the RGPD, typified in Article 83.5 of the GDPR. FIFTH: The aforementioned initiation agreement

paying profiles. II.4. Article 12(1),(2) and (3), Article 17, Article 19, Article 24(1) and Article 25(1) AVG 63. Article 12 (1) GDPR stipulates that the

the OWNERS COMMUNITY ***ADDRESS.1, with CIF ***CIF.1, for a infringement of Article 5.1.f) of the RGPD, typified in Article 83.5 of the RGPD, with a fine

breach of the obligation to inform pursuant to Article 14 of the GDPR 20. According to Article 14 of the GDPR: 1. Where personal data has not been collected

the alleged violation of article 5.1.f), typified in 83.5 GDPR. SECOND: APPOINT B.B.B. as instructor. and, as secretary, to C.C.C., indicating that any of

accordance with article 6, paragraph 1, letter a), or article Article 9, paragraph 2, letter a), and this is not based on another legal basis; c) the interest

and Article 5, Chapter IV and Article 83. The relevant obligations 2.5. Chapter 1 GDPR sets out the general provisions. Article 5 of Chapter I GDPR sets

(hereinafter, LPACAP), for the alleged violation of Article 21.1 of the LSSI, typified in the Article 38.4.d) of the LSSI. SIXTH: The aforementioned start-up

exemptions set out in Article 14(5) GDPR apply in this case, the DPA found a violation of the principle of transparency in Article 5(1)(a) GDPR and the obligations

accordance with Article 56 paragraph 1 of the Regulation. 23. Applying the cooperation and consistency mechanism provided for in Chapter VII of the GDPR, the CNIL

claimed party, for the alleged infringement of Article 5.1.c) of the GDPR, typified in Article 83.4 of the GDPR. Once the Initiation Agreement was notified