Search results

data processing on a large scalethe by the number of clients it has (article 83.2 a)Basic personal identifiers are affected (article 83.2 g)Therefore, in

instead of a fine, although the sanction is still mentionning that the infringement at stake is subject to a fine according to Article 83.5 GDPR, in the lights

with Articles 58(1)(a), 58(1)(e) and 58(2)(i) GDPR. It therefore imposed a €2000 fine on the defendant and applied corrective measures to get SC C&V Water

infringements (83.2 e) RGPD). - It has not obtained direct benefits (83.2 k) RGPD and 76.2.c) LOPDGDD). - The claimed entity is not considered a large company

referred to Article 5(1)(a) (principle of lawfulness, fairness and transparency), Article 12(1), Article 7, Article 13 and Article 14 GDPR, the corresponding

establishes article 83.2 of the RGPD, and with the provisions of article 76 of the LOPDGDD, regarding section k) of the aforementioned article 83.2 RGPD. In

fine of 2.500 € for the violation of the principle of integrity and confidentiality, pursuant to Article 83(5)(a) GDPR. Share your comments here! Share blogs

data under Article 9(2)(a) GDPR and there was no other legal basis for the processing under Article 9(2) GDPR. Consequently, the DSB issued a fine of EUR

k) of the mentioned article 83.2 RGPD.Consequently, the following facts have been taken into account as aggravating factors:-Art. 83.2 b) RGPD: the intentionality

positively to the request of the Complainant in accordance with Article 12(2) GDPR and Article 15 GDPR. The HDPA imposed an administrative fine of EUR 20,000 on

outside it, constitute a violation of Article 5 (1) (f) of the RGPD? For infringing Article 5(1)(f) GDPR, in conjunction with Article 72(1)(a) LOPDGDD, the Spanish

Consequently, based on Article 83(5)(a) GDPR, the hospital was fined to pay a fine of EUR 30.000,00 for violation of Article 5(1)(f) GDPR. Corrective measures

Ordinance, Article 83 No. 5, cf. Article 83 No. 2, an infringement fee must be imposed for a breach of the Personal Protection Ordinance as a result of

paragraph k) of Article 83.2 of the RGPD, the LOPDGDD, Article 76, "Sanctions and corrective measures", it provides: "In accordance with Article 83(2)(k) of Regulation

other legal basis for processing under Article 6 GDPR, the controller had violated Article 5(1)(a) and Article 6(1) GDPR. Taking into account the low income

review the relevant conditions in the Privacy Ordinance, Article 83 no.2: 4.2.2. Article 83 (2) (a): Grade, severity andthe duration of the infringement,

parent's request, thus violating Article 15(1) and (4) GDPR as well as the principle of accountability pursuant to Article 5(2) GDPR. The complainant requested

but it signifies identified catives (article 83.2 b)  Basic personal identifiers -image- are affected (art 83.2 g) Therefore, based on the foregoing,

Protection Agency sanction A.A.A., with NIF ***NIF.1, for a violation of article 6 of the RGPD, classified in article 83.5 of the RGPD, with a fine of €10,000 (ten

Laws of 2019, item 1781), Article 83 (1)-(3), Article 83 (5)(e) in connection with Article 31, Article 58 (1)(e), Article 58 (2)(i) of Regulation EU 2016/679