Search results

Spanish DPA held that where an employee had signed an image rights transfer agreement with their employer, prior to the display of an advertisement banner using

service provider provided an IP address, insofar as that legislation enables the national court seised of an application for an order for disclosure of personal

Act , an administrative sanction may be imposed on an enterprise itselfif no individual has shown guilt. This means that Oslo Municipality has an objectiveliability

Norwegian DPA (Datatilsynet) stating that they had been subject to an unauthorized credit rating. An employee of the credit rating agency has indeed triggered a

club (UAB VS FITNESS), fingerprint scanning is required. It then initiated an own volition investigation of a possible breach of the GDPR. The VDAI found

constitute an economic activity for the service provider. ... c) "Service provider" or "provider": natural or legal person that provides an information

data subjects were harmed in any way. After an overall assessment, the PVN concluded (under doubt) that an administrative fine for such a violation should

breach of Article 83(6) GDPR for failure to comply with an order of the DPA, the DPA imposed an administrative fine of €440,000 on the controller pursuant

in particular by means of assignment to an identifier such as a name; an identification number, location data, an online identifier or one or more factors

Benefits Department used the applicants' nationality (Dutch/not Dutch) as an indicator in an automated "risk-classification model", to assess which applications

Administrative Courts. For example, Administrative Courts are competent to deal with an action for misuse of powers against a national decree which allows uninterrupted

Norwegian Data Protection Authority's assessment of an infringement fee of NOK 100,000 for having monitored an employee's e-mail box without a legal basis, cf

83(5)(e) in fine of Regulation 2016/679, to an administrative fine of up to EUR 20,000,000, and in the case of an undertaking, up to 4% of its total annual

photographed and / or photographed by the selfie box during an active action. In connection with the start of an event, it is announced over loudspeakers that there

remembered that the complainant was an employee of a higher federal authority and repeated the request to present an ID card in order to obtain a PeP (politically

question per. email, even if they had an email address registered with the Zoo. Against this background, Zoo stated that an extract of e-mail addresses had been

in these proceedings, has made an attempt to justify such proceedings. Considering that the Company is an entrepreneur, an entity professionally participating

personal data to Google LLC in the U.S. The respondent is an online retail company. The complainant is an individual represented by noyb - European Centre for

new call on 20/10/2020. The company reports that due to an obvious and unacceptable error by an employee, the implementation of the inclusion of the number

self-employed and liberal professionals to switch from a paper to an electronic invoice. Due to an error in the selection of e-mail addresses, a number of the