Search results

according to ***URL.2 - gads, expiring on November 2, 2021 and for advertising purposes according to ***URL.2 - _ga, expiring on 2 November 2021 and for

violated Article 5(1)(a) GDPR, Article 5(1)(c) GDPR, Article 6 GDPR and Section 3 of the Finnish Act on the Protection of Privacy in Working Life. As a result

the provisions of article 58.2.b) of the RGPD, a warning sanction for an infringement of Article 14 of the RGPD, typified in article 83.5.b) of the RGPD

data controller a notice pursuant to Article 58(2)(b) of the General Data Protection Regulation and an order pursuant to Article 58(2)(d) of the General

violation of data minimisation, Article 5(1)(c) GDPR. No fines can be imposed against the controller and Article 83(5) GDPR can therefore not be imposed.

NIF P3120800B, for an infringement of article 5.1.a) of the RGPD, in accordance with article 83.5 a) of the RGPD, a warning sanction. SECOND: NOTIFY this

2019 that it was operating. Following Article 83(5)(a)GDPR, read in the lights of Recital (148) GDPR, the AEPD issued a reprimand to the owner of the video

defendant is defined in Articles 83.4.a) and 83.4.b) respectively. 83.5.a) of the RGPD, precepts that they establish: Article 83.4: "Violations of the following

infringement of article 5.1(b), as defined in Article 83(5)(a) and considered for the purposes of the statute of limitations in Article 72(1)(a), a fine of EUR

negligent action, but significant (article 83.2 b) - Basic personal identifiers are affected (name, surname, address) (article 83.2 g) -The evident link between

with NIF B01528736, for a violation of Article 58.2 of the RGPD, typified in Article 83.5 of the RGPD, a fine of two thousand euros (2,000 euros). SECOND:

The AEPD issued a Spanish City Council with a warning of an infringement of Article 5(1)(c) pursuant to Article 83(5) over installed surveillance cameras

Protection, pursuant to Article 83(3) and Article 83(4)(a) and Article 83(5)(e) of Regulation 2016/679, in conjunction with Article 103 of the Personal Data

the respondent, by the alleged violation of Article 5.1.c) of the RGPD, as defined in Article 83.5 of the GDPR. SIXTH: Formal notification of the agreement

whichever is higher, is applied. With reference to the elements listed in Article 83(2) of the Regulation for the purposes of the application of the pecuniary

with Article 31, Article 58(1)(e) in connection with Article 83(1-3) and Article 83(5)(e) of Regulation 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council

the infringement. In relation to letter k) of article 83.2 of the RGPD, the LOPDGDD, in its article Article 76, “Sanctions and corrective measures”, establishes

significant (article 83.2 b). -Basic personal identifiers are affected (name, a number of identification, the line identifier) (article 83.2 g). -Any offense

thatestablishes article 83.2 of the RGPD, and with the provisions of article 76 of theLOPDGDD, regarding section k) of the aforementioned article 83.2 RGPD.In

RESOLVES: FIRST: IMPOSE A.A.A., with NIF ***NIF.1, for an infraction of article 5.1.c) of the RGPD, typified in article 83.5 a) of the RGPD, a fine of €1,000 (one