Search results

Articles 13 and 14 GDPR complied with the principle of transparency in Article 5 (2) (1) (a) GDPR, which according to the Authority's assessment i.a. implies that

provisions of article 58.2.i) of the GDPR, for the alleged infringement of article 6.1 of the GDPR, typified in article 83.5.b) of the GDPR. SECOND: APPOINT

authority. Under Article 60 GDPR, the following DPAs were identified as “concerned supervisory authorities” under Article 4(22) GDPR: the Netherlands,

user registrations, the respondent violated Article 5 GDPR, Article 6 GDPR, and Article 32 GDPR, and § 1 para 1 DSG (the Austrian Data Protection Act), which

under Article 82(1) of the GDPR; they can only "lead to [...] non-material damage". [21] (7) Compensation for non-material damage under Art 82(1) GDPR therefore

the Guarantor pursuant to Article 166, paragraph 7, of the Code "(Article 16, paragraph 1, of the Guarantor Regulation no. 1/2019). The aforementioned

requirements of article 24 and 32, paragraph 1, AVG and further elaborated in article32, paragraph2, preamble, FISHOrdinancesBIO standards5.1.1,5.1.1.1and5.1.2.1.

provisions of article 43.1 of said Law. C/ Jorge Juan, 6 www.aepd.es 28001 - Madrid sedeagpd.gob.es 9/9 II Article 85 of Law 39/2015 of 1 October on the

the authority ofcontrol pursuant to Article 58 (2), or failure to provide access in breachof article 58, paragraph 1. "Organic Law 3/2018, on the Protection

an infractionof article 6 of the RGPD, typified in article 83.5.a) and classified as very serious toprescription effects in article 72.1.b) of the LOPDGDD

implementing the ePrivacy Directive and Articles 6(1)(a) and 7 GDPR, in the lights of Article 4(11) and Recital 32 GDPR. Following this report, the GBA issued a

Consequently, I have suffered significant non-pecuniary damage, since the person with whom I kissing me was not my partner at that time. I request that

complaint - infringes Article 6(1) GDPR, by unlawfully processing the complainant's personal data, in relation to Article 5(1)(f) GDPR, which governs the

his/her consent. The DPA first outlined Article 6(1)(a) and (b) GDPR, Articles 4(11) GDPR on consent, as well as Article 6 of the Spanish Data Protection Law

Agency sanction QUALITY for an infringement of Article 58.1 of the GDPR, typified in Article 83.5 of the GDPR, with a fine of €20,000.00. This proposed resolution

principles are found under Article 5(1)(a) and Article 5(2) GDPR respectively]. The Spanish DPA even made reference to Recital 40 GDPR on the legality of processing

by the defendant under Article 6(1) GDPR? Did the controller infringe the data minimisation principle under Article 5(1)(c) GDPR? Did the controller commit

disclosing personal data from a surveillance footage, thus breaching Article 5(1)(a) GDPR and Article 6. The company appealed to the Norwegian Privacy Appeals Board

employee of the entity - infringes Article 32. 2 and 32.4 of the RGPD, an infringement punishable under Article 83.4.a of the GDPR. Assessing the circumstances

Spanish DPA (AEPD) fined Borjamotor, S.A. for infringing Article 7 GDPR and Article Article 21(1) of the Spanish Law on Information Society Services (LSSI)