Search results

penalty type of the Article 83.5.a, RGPD. IV In determining the administrative fine to be imposed, the provisions of articles 83.1 and 83.2 of the RGPD, precepts

Moreover, following an infringement of Article 12(3) GDPR, as explained above, under the provisions of Article 83 of the GDPR, I take into account the following

and Article 57(1)(a), Article 58(2)(d) and (i) in connection with Article 5(1)(a), (e) and (f) and (2), Article 24(1) and (2), Article 28, Article 30(1)(d)

typified in article 83.4 of the RGPD, with a warning. -For an infringement of Article 32 of the RGPD, typified in article 83.4 of the RGPD, with a warning

Guarantee of Digital Rights (Article 32.2). In determining the fine, the following aggravating factors under Article 83 GDPR were considered: unintentional

signifiesidentified catives (article 83.2 b) Basic personal identifiers -image- are affected (art 83.2g)VOn the other hand, article 83.7 of the RGPD provides

Bologna for violation of Articles 5(2)(f) and 9 GDPR. On the basis of Articles 58(2)(i) and 83 GDPR, the Garante imposed a fine of € 18 000 on the Local Health

under Article 5 (1)(e)GDPR, the duty to provide information under Article 13 GDPR, and the obligation to carry out a DPIA under Article 35(3)(b) GDPR. The

high (Article 83 (2 ) (a) of Regulation 2016/679); b) relevant previous violations of the provisions of Regulation 2016/679 by the Company (Article 83 (2

Privacy Ordinance Article 83 No. 5 and Article 83 No. 4, cf. Article 83. No. 2, an infringement fee shall be imposed for the acts, and if a fee is to be imposed

facing a serious negligent action (article 83.2 b). Basic personal identifiers are affected (name, surname, mobile phone number) (article 83.2 g). The

regard to Article 83.2 (k) of the RGPD, the LOPDGDD, Article 76, "Sanctions and corrective measures", provides: "2. In accordance with Article 83(2)(k) of

Ordinance Article 83 no. 2 letters a to k. to highlight factors that are to be given special weight. With reference to Article 83 no. 2 letter a «The nature

the alleged violation of article 5.1.f) of the GDPR and article 32 of the GDPR, typified in articles 83.5 and 83.4 of the GDPR, respectively The initiation

of the GDPR, nor tainted its deliberation of manifest error of assessment or insufficient motivation. 5. Finally, under Article 83 of the GDPR: "1. each

Regulation applicable, pursuant to Article 58, paragraph 2, letter i), of the Regulation itself and Article 166, paragraph 2, of the Code. In this context,

Subsequently, the court imposed the controller with a 1000€ in accordance with Article 83(5) GDPR. Finally, the court prompted that it is the responsibility

these messages. Is this a violation of Article 6(1)(a) GDPR? The AEPD held that this behaviour was a violation of Article 6(1)(a) GDPR and fined Vodafone €100

" Regarding section k) of article 83.2 of the RGPD, the LOPDGDD, article 76, "Sanctions and corrective measures", provides: "2. In accordance with the provisions

"Regarding section k) of article 83.2 of the RGPD, the LOPDGDD, article 76," Sanctions and corrective measures", provides:"2. In accordance with the provisions