Search results

pharmacy and may only be provided by pharmaceutical staff of this pharmacy. 33. It is therefore irrelevant whether the customer reviews are attributable

main claim            EUR 2,022.37 32Credit reform file number            N04 33Date of default                         00.00.0000 34Completion Date           

notification of this decision. For the rest, the requests will be rejected. Penalty 4.33. The requested penalty will be rejected. For the time being, the trust is

what the applicable lawful base is. Decision on the merits 03/2021 - 11/11 33. Considering the importance of transparency with regard to the decision-making

to the protection of the processing of personal data. Pursuant to Article 33 §1 of the DPA, the Litigation Chamber is the administrative litigation body

proceedings are of the same nature as in the earlier phase of the procedure. 33. This means that the WOG itself already provides that the person submitting

DPA of the breach, within the 72 hour prescribed time-frame under Article 33(1) GDPR. Following the notification, the Hungarian DPA initiated an investigation

tourist tax – is authorized in execution of this article 5.1.c) of the GDPR. 33. As this tourist tax is calculated annually and on the basis of a flat rate

scraping incident does not constitute a reportable violation under Article 33 of the GDPR. (No. 37) (editorial principle) 3. Non-material damage that can

May 2018 on the protection of personal data (Journal of Laws of 2010, No. 33, item 159, as amended). 1 - 3 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European

the legal director, himself to the administrative and financial director. " 33. Regarding the establishment of an activity report, the head of the investigation

of using the telephone number for the CIT as well as a violation of Article 33 GDPR because The scraping incident was not reported to the supervisory authority

Article 84 of the Law of 17 June 2016 and Articles 33 and 35 of the Law of 18 June 2016. 2016 and 33 and 35 of the Royal Decree of 18 April 2017. The Special

Berlin-Brandenburg, judgment of January 26, 2011 - OVG 9 N 62.11 - quoted from juris, para. 33; for the administration of a sales volume meter: VG Potsdam, judgment of April

Programme. The nature of the personal data and special category data disclosed 33. As part of its guidance and resources relating to UK GDPR, the Commissioner

directly from the provisions in articles 5, subsection 1, letter f, 24, 25, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36 and 39, that the data controller must deal with the risk to the

EU:C:2021:504, paragraph 61, judgment Nowak, C-434/16, EU:C:2017:994, paragraph 33 and judgment Rijkeboer, C-553/07, EU:C:2009:293, paragraph 59. Page 15 of

pursuant to art. 33 of the Regulation The Company in relation to the violation of personal data, notified to the Guarantor, pursuant to art. 33 of the Regulation

However, the result was that the dismissal of the Restore the first judgement. [33] The decision on the costs of the The appeal procedure is based on §§ 41,

The worker can therefore be considered to have been freely given consent. 33. As to the specific nature of consent, the Litigation Chamber considers that