Search results

processing of location data. The Data protection authority (the DSB) issued guidelines here. The DSB explained the existing legal basis for the collection and

data subject filed a complaint with the DSB claiming a violation of his right to access under Article 15 GDPR. The DSB partially upheld the complaint of the

2020, Art. 32 GDPR marginal 40; Notification of the Austrian DSB, Az. D213.692 / 0001-DSB / 2018 from November 16, 2018, 3.2., Available at https://www

violation of the GDPR. The complaint, originally filed with the Austrian DPA (DSB), advanced a number of grounds upon which the consent of the data subject

Digital Rights) filed a complaint with the Austrian DPA (DSB) against the controller and asked the DSB to order the controller to stop all processing operations

96(3) TKG. Spam Emails are regulated in § 107(3) TKG. The Datenschutzbehörde (DSB) is the national data protection authority for Austria. It has replace the

from the e-card using the e-card system (paragraphs 31 a, ff ASVG) or 2. Using an E-ID (§ 2 Z 10 E-GovG) or2. Using an E-ID (Section 2, Number 10, E-GovG)

maintained video records for 48 hours. In response to the Austrian DPA's (DSB) investigation, the controller noted that preventing pupils from being endangered

(case number: DSB-D124.1413/22) [Editor's note: Names and companies, legal forms and product names, addresses (including URLs, IP and e-mail addresses)

"reception theory" for example the decision of the DSB of February 22, 2019, GZ: DSB-D124.098/0002-DSB/2019, available in the RIS) . the Respondent received

2020 (case number: DSB-D124.909) [Note processor: Names and companies, legal forms and product names, addresses (incl. URLs, IP and e-mail addresses), file

In particular, consent shall be specific to every “processing operation” (i.e. the purpose of the processing). When there are multiple processing operations

with the DSB on the phone and stated that they did not receive the e-mails due to technical problems and that the DSB should resend them to another e-mail

Law'). The DSB disagreed, stating the forwarding of the complainant's name does not comply with the principle of data minimisation. Thus, the DSB held that

interpreting the right to confidentiality (cf. the DSB's decision of October 31, 2018, GZ DSB-D123.076/0003-DSB/2018).The GDPR and in particular The principles

personal data. On 22 January 2022, the complainant disclosed the official e-mail address and the official telephone number of a data subject to the Austrian

personal data within the meaning of Art. 9 GDPR (cf. DSB of June 7, 2018, GZ DSB-D202.207/0001-DSB/2018, mwN). Paragraph 7, DSG standardizes data processing

(case number: DSB-D124.1473/22) [Editor's note: Names and companies, legal forms and product names, addresses (including URLs, IP and e-mail addresses)

C-469/10 [ASNEF and FECEMD] para. 38) (cf. the Notice of the DSB from 4.7.2019, GZ: DSB-D123.652/0001-DSB/2019, RIS, license plate recognition).,4. In this context

2021 (case number: DSB-D124.2701) [Editor's note: Names and companies, legal forms and product names, addresses (including URLs, IP and e-mail addresses)