Search results
From GDPRhub
- consisted of 2 parts – first instance ruling by the DPA and second instance ruling by the Appellant Body within the same DPA. First instance decision Due to the246 KB (39,598 words) - 09:26, 24 April 2024
- court of last instance, considered the two issues ruled on by the Provincial Administrative Court in Warsaw, the court of first instance. First, the Court49 KB (7,938 words) - 15:32, 28 March 2023
- requested that the controller delete all of his personal data and ensure that none of it was transferred to third parties. The controller informed the data10 KB (1,522 words) - 07:50, 24 April 2024
- Discussion The first and second grounds of appeal It is convenient to consider the first and second grounds of appeal together87 KB (14,773 words) - 09:28, 1 March 2022
- for access is part of a broader commercial dispute which a court of first instance may decide if it is seised of the following questions: whether or not52 KB (8,603 words) - 16:55, 12 December 2023
- 3, item 39). The court of first instance sufficiently explained the reasons for its decision. In a manner enabling an instance review, he indicated the74 KB (12,347 words) - 13:46, 9 October 2023
- that the chances of my former partner receiving the information, either first hand or otherwise, were extremely low, however the thought of such an occurrence46 KB (7,676 words) - 10:45, 7 December 2021
- The Rotterdam Court of First Instance forbids the disclosure of a deceased person's genetic data, which had been processed for the purposes of medical-scientific31 KB (5,039 words) - 16:28, 10 March 2022
- apps, private communications, keywords, etc. The controller claimed that none of the cameras used facial recognition techniques (which was supported with57 KB (8,117 words) - 10:35, 13 December 2023
- of the Court of First Instance II (rejection of the apology to "citizens" via the defendant's website). Original court of first instance rejected the claim103 KB (16,947 words) - 08:34, 24 April 2024
- action with which the court of first instance was vested, which remained unchanged throughout the trial before the first instance, is represented of the applicant's56 KB (9,274 words) - 14:44, 5 October 2022
- that even though the bank had the right to obtain the information in this instance, it would still have to provide the data subject with information on processing10 KB (1,413 words) - 11:07, 13 January 2021
- procedure is to be sentenced by the court. In the opinion of the court of first instance. 2.10. The court is of the opinion that ' [A] of its obligations under19 KB (3,309 words) - 10:50, 23 April 2021
- of the dispute in the first instance and the applications made there, reference is also made to the facts of the first instance judgment. 23 The labor51 KB (8,324 words) - 15:52, 18 January 2024
- application of the de-referral, with a view to the judgment of the Court of First Instance in the Google/CNIL. (Section 5 infra). 17. Fourthly, the Litigation131 KB (22,429 words) - 16:57, 12 December 2023
- Notice as "Ticketmaster's First Representations" and "Ticketmaster's Second Representations" respectively. 5.5 Ticketmaster's First Representations included:130 KB (21,195 words) - 13:52, 25 April 2021
- in connection with preventing official food control): "The court of first instance and the authorities inspected in administrative court proceedings are51 KB (8,322 words) - 09:51, 17 November 2023
- processing of personal data as they can access and control bank accounts, for instance. The DPA recalled that a controller has the duty to implement appropriate55 KB (9,017 words) - 10:46, 13 December 2023
- contested judgment dealt with this allegation in the instance in the following terms:"... On the other hand, none of the assumptions that according to section48 KB (7,584 words) - 12:55, 16 September 2021
- responded by providing a screenshot from his device showing the first call and two more (the first on 7/5/2021, the next on 7/26/2021 and 9/6/2021). The company102 KB (17,186 words) - 13:46, 26 April 2024