Search results

protection of personal data, approved with resolution of the Guarantor no. 98 of 4/4/2019, published in the Official Gazette. n. 106 of 8/5/2019 and in www.gpdp

personal data of third parties, including those relating to health (Article 4(10)). The DPA held that this constitutes a violation of Article 6(1)(e) and

reporting system pursuant to Article 4:32 of the Dutch Financial Supervision Act (Wft). In addition, under Article 4:34 of the Financial Supervision Act

delete the URLs they requested from Google on 3 and 12 February 2019. 4 The requests 4.1. In case 19-64, [plaintiff 1] requests the court, by order enforceable

(Art. 4 Z 1 DSGVO) cannot rely on the rights of Art 12 to 22 and Art 119 of May 4th, 2016 p. 1 (hereinafter: GDPR), as well as § 1 Para. 3 DSG. (4) The

banner that appeared on the website of the controller during your own visit. 4. However, the control authority must provide an effective response to the individual

from from receipt of the request. 9 3 4GDPR, Art. 4.7), 4.8), 24, 26, 28, 29; GDPR, recitals 74, 79 and 81. GDPR, art. 4, 2). 5EDPB, “Guidelines 07/2020 concerning

original. Please refer to the German original for more details. W211 2223243-1 / 4E On behalf of the republic! The Federal Administrative Court recognizes through

appeal can be found in the appendix to this ruling. What is this case about? 4. The claimant has requested access to data registered about him in the Tax

revamped website and to provide job search assistance. Jigler stated that ex-employees who had been out of service for some time were also emailed due

of how it plans to bring the processing activities into compliances within 4 weeks. Is consent considered in this case as freely given? Data subjects are

provide services. There is also no profiling within the meaning of Art. 4 Z 4 GDPR. None were achieved automated processing of personal data for the purpose

of the plaintiff's participation in the test in May 2022 in § 4 and in the appendix to § 4 of the statutes of the defendant university for admissions to

rejected (paragraph 4). 1.9. The complainant lodged a timely complaint with the Federal Administrative Court against points 3 and 4 of this decision. 1

from publishing the portrait in question (order of 29 December 2015, Annex K4, p. 14 et seq., as well as supplements from the Regional Court of Cologne to

reason for exclusion applies (4.2) and how a weighing of interests required in the reason for exclusion results (4.2.3). (4.1) Classification problem While

contact [aimed] at providing commercial information" of Comparafacile (see p. 2.4. of the Private agreement between Comparafacile and XX). For the licensing

Paragraph 1 in conjunction with Art. 83 Paragraph 1 and 4 Letter a GDPR OJ L 2016/119, p. and 4 Litera a, GDPR OJ L 2016/119, p. 1, as amended For these

of 15 March 2019, ECLI: NL: HR: 2019: 376, para 4.2.2, of 28 May 2019, ECLI: NL: HR: 2019: 793, para. 2.4.5. and of 19 July 2019, ECLI: NL: HR: 2019: 1278

data protection breaches in accordance with the GDPR; [4] https://www.zbp.pl/getmedia/45bb9af8-95a4-4cc2-9767-05c73e5b1eb3/Raport-InfoDOK-II-kwartal-2023;