Search results

under the GDPR and to keep within the legal timeframes; and also giving due regard to the circumstances contemplated under Article 83.2 of the GDPR and taking

the social and health authority of a city to had breached Article 6 GDPR and Article 10 GDPR by requesting data subjects to provide it with personal data

personal data within the meaning of Article 4(1) GDPR and thus cannot be object of an access request under Article 15(3) GDPR. Making reference to CJEU case

infringement of Article 5.1.b), c) and e) GDPR and Article 5.1.a) j° Article 6.1 GDPR; - on the basis of Article 58.2.c) of the GDPR and Article 95, § 1, 5°

service questioned compliance with Article 5(1)(b) GDPR). Additionally, the provisions of Articles 12(2), 21 and 25 GDPR did not appear to be satisfied because

according to Article 58(2)(d) GDPR. First, the AEPD established that the GDPR was applicable under Article 3(1) GPDR or, if not, at least Article 3(2)(a) GDPR

required under Article 13 GDPR, as well as the fact of data transfer abroad, were completely missing. The DPA stated that Article 13 GDPR only provides

under Article 14 GDPR, comply with his access request pursuant to Article 15 GDPR, and to erase his personal data pursuant to Article 17(1)(c) GDPR. The

legal basis under Article 6(1) GDPR. It rejected the argument of the boating club that the publication was lawful under Article 6(1)(f) GDPR, citing the judgment

context of Articles 40 and 41 GDPR, in particular from Article 40 Paragraph 4 in conjunction with Article 41 Paragraph 2 lit. c) GDPR, namely further that a monitoring

pursuant to Article 83(5)(e) GDPR. Second, the DPA considered the non-compliance with the summons to breach breach of Article 58(1)(a) and (e) GDPR. The delay

infringed Article 5(1)(a) and 5(1)(b) GDPR and reprimanded them. First, the controller claimed consent as legal basis for processing under Article 6(1) GDPR

DPA fined Amazon Road €2,000,000 for a violation of Article 6(1) GDPR, Article 10 GDPR and Article 10 LOPDGDD for requesting criminal record certificates

of the GDPR, which is a condition for a reprimand pursuant to Article 58(2)(b) GDPR. Material scope of the GDPR According to the court, the GDPR applies

provisions of Article 3o , Article 4(2) and Article 6(1)(b), all of the GDPR Implementing Law. 57. Under the terms of Article 55(1) of the GDPR, supervisory

the distribution of the burden of proof for damages under Article 82 GDPR. Does Article 82 GDPR put the burden of proof for damages that result from a data

Art. 28(1) of the GDPR. In this function, he or she is obliged to fulfil the data protection obligations pursuant to Art. 28(3)(a) to (h) of the GDPR. In

The course of the proceedings 1.1-1.3 2 NJCM c.s. and FNV 2.1-2.5 3 The facts 3.1-3.10 4 The SyRI legislation 4.1-4.3 General 4.4-4.7 Provision of data for

shall comply with Article 6 (1) of the GDPR and Article 13 (1) of the GDPR- (2) of the GDPR and Article 58 (2) point b) of the GDPR decided in accordance

violation of Article 52 of the Code, for which an administrative sanction is provided for (Article 166, para 2 of the Code and Article 83(3) of the Regulation);