Search results

controller violated Article 33(1) GDPR by failing to inform the DPA of the data breach. Second, the DPA held that the controller violated Article 28(1), (3) and

referred to Article 5(1)(a) (principle of lawfulness, fairness and transparency), Article 12(1), Article 7, Article 13 and Article 14 GDPR, the corresponding

the next month to inform the employees in conformity with Article 89 LOPDGDD and Article 13 GDPR. Share your comments here! Share blogs or news articles

down in Article 28 of the GDPR. The Commission wonders about such a qualification in the light of the definition of a subcontractor given in Article 4.8 of

dati personali - GDPD) found that the controller had violated Article 5 and Article 9 GDPR; it fined the controller €40,000, balancing, among other things

Pursuant to Art. 57 GDPR, the President of the Personal Data Protection Office - as a supervisory authority within the meaning of Art. 51 GDPR - monitors and

the sense of Article 4, headings under 12, of the GDPR. What should be clear is that a breach is some type of security incident Article 4, headings under

by the plaintiff pursuant to Article 82(1) GDPR, since there have been violations of Article 6(1)(a) GDPR and Article 34 GDPR. The defendant also breached

transparency of processing enshrined in Article 5(1)(a) GDPR and against the provisions of Article 12 GDPR and Article 13 GDPR. Share your comments here! Share

party. Therefore, the controller breached Article 5(1)(a) GDPR, Article 6(1)(a) GDPR, Article 7 GDPR, and Article 130 of the Italian privacy code, since the

DPA found that the controller violated the following GDPR provisions: Articles 5(1), 6(1) and 7 GDPR for acquiring personal data from a third party for marketing

transparency from Article 5(1)(a) GDPR. Therefore, the controller violated the principle of accountability provided by Article 5(2) and 24 GDPR for the failure

company was not compliant with Article 13 GDPR. The CNPD held that the controller infringed Article 5(1)(c) GDPR and Article 13 GDPR and decided to: - impose

lawfulness, fairness and transparency under Article 5(1)(a) GDPR, and the principle of accountability under Article 5(2) GDPR. Additionally, the HDPA held that the

further data dissemination on the controller for violating Article 5 GDPR and Article 12 GDPR. The case involves a complaint filed against Edizioni Proposta

461/1969 as amended. : Article 6, Article 51, paragraph one, Article 57, paragraph one, letter h, Article 58, paragraph 2, letter f, GDPR of Regulation (EU)

processing and confidentiality (article 5 par. 1 a) and f) GDPR) and constitutes an incident of infringement (Article 4 no. 12 GDPR) 21 b) incorrect handling

personal data and information under Article 15 GDPR in his Google account, Google has not violated Article 15 GDPR concerning this data/information. As

meaning of article 4.19 of the GDPR – (article 13.1. c) of the GDPR) and does not mention the data retention periods personal data processed (article 13.2.

definition of the concept of consent in the data protection regulation article 4, No. 11. Article 4 of the Data Protection Regulation, no. 11 states that consent