Search results

sanctions (articles 58, par. 2, lett. I and 83 of the Regulation; art. 166, paragraph 7, of the Code) The Guarantor, pursuant to art. 58, par. 2, lett. i), and

violating Article 5(1)(c) GDPR, the DPA fined the controller €50,000. In its assessment of the fine, the DPA noted three aggravating factors per Article 83(2)

paragraph 1 to 1. c) and5, paragraph 1, al. f), all of the aforementioned regulations;-pursuant to article 58, paragraph 2, al. i) the GDPR, the application

organisation contravene Article 5(1)(f) GDPR? The AEPD found that the disclosure of her personal data to the 400 members violated Article 5(1)(f) GDPR. The AEPD stressed

analyse the criteria set out in Article 83.2 of the GDPR. 61. As regards the nature and seriousness of the breach (Article 83(2)(a) of the RGPD), it points

in Article 83.5 of the GDPR, as well as for the alleged infringement of Article 17 of the GDPR, typified in the Article 83.5 of the GDPR, respectively, in

of Articles 5(1)(a), 6 and 28(3) GDPR and adopted an administrative fine on the basis of Articles 58(2)(i) and 83 GDPR. The total amount of the fine took

legal bases of contract (Article 6(1)(b) GDPR), legal obligation (Article 6(1)(c) GDPR) and legitimate interest (Article 6(1)(f) GDPR) and determined that

violation of article 28.2 typified in Article 83.4 a) GDPR. SIXTY THOUSAND EUROS (€60,000) for alleged violation of article 28.3 typified in Article 83.4 a)

that article 58.2 of the RGPD recognizes to each authority of control, and as established in arts. 47 and 48.1 of the LOPDGDD, the Director of C / Jorge

Consequently, based on Article 83(5)(a) GDPR, the hospital was fined to pay a fine of EUR 30.000,00 for violation of Article 5(1)(f) GDPR. Corrective measures

to whom the personal data was disclosed pursuant to article 17 paragraph 2 and article 19, [...]". 2.2 According to the Guidelines 5/2020 of the ESPD regarding

significant (article 83.2 b) Basic personal identifiers (name, an identification number, the line identifier) are affected, according to article 83.2 g) • •

President of UODO to exercise the corrective powers provided for in Article 58(2) GDPR. The proceedings revealed that the obligation to submit statements

following criteria established by article 83.2 of the RGPD, considering as aggravating circumstance according to article 76.2 b) LOPDGDD, the relationship of

procedure to the claimed, by thealleged violation of Article 5.1.c) of the GDPR, typified in Article 83.5 of theRGPD. FIFTH: Consulted the database of this

According to Article 83(2) GDPR, administrative fines should be imposed in addition to or instead of the measures referred to in Article 58(2)(a) to (h)

significant negligent action (Article 83(2)(b) GDPR) and that basic personal identifiers were affected (Article 83(2)(g) GDPR). The economic volume of the

Articles 13 GDPR and 7 GDPR respectively? To determine the amount of the penalty, the AEPD took into account three criteria in Article 83(2) GDPR: unintentional

controller) about €352,555 (NOK 4,000,000) for violating Article 5(1)(f) GDPR, Article 24 GDPR and Article 32 GDPR after a serious ransomware attack led to highly