Search results

appeal can be found in the appendix to this ruling. What is this case about? 4. The claimant has requested access to data registered about him in the Tax

revamped website and to provide job search assistance. Jigler stated that ex-employees who had been out of service for some time were also emailed due

form of making available, the 4 reconciliation or interconnection, limitation, erasure or destruction”. 5 19. GDPR Article 4(7) defines “controller” as “the

a public hearing upon request or, if it deems it necessary, ex officio. Pursuant to para 4 leg cit, the administrative court may refrain from holding a

contact [aimed] at providing commercial information" of Comparafacile (see p. 2.4. of the Private agreement between Comparafacile and XX). For the licensing

accordance with Art. 133 Para. 4 B-VG. the Statement must be briefly justified. The revision is not permitted according to Art. 133 Para. 4 B-VG because the decision

paragraph 2, point 4 of the Telecommunications Law?". has adopted a resolution: The court is entitled - pursuant to Art. 159.2.4 of the Act of 16 July

data protection breaches in accordance with the GDPR; [4] https://www.zbp.pl/getmedia/45bb9af8-95a4-4cc2-9767-05c73e5b1eb3/Raport-InfoDOK-II-kwartal-2023;

SportsDirect claimed this to be on the basis of legitimate interest for the ex-members of the scheme. Throughout the investigation, SportsDirect cited the

and information from controllers regarding their employees (Article L.614-4(1)(a) Labour code). These documents had to contain information about, amongst

formulate the legal basis for launching such application. The purpose of the ex-ante impact assessment is to identify and manage risks in a timely manner

of the consultation. The DPA further clarified that pursuant to Article 42(4) ZPacP, the data subject is indeed entitled to be informed of her deceased

article 32 of the RGPD is referenced in article 83.4.a) of the cited GDPR in the following terms: "4. Violations of the following provisions will be sanctioned

delete the URLs they requested from Google on 3 and 12 February 2019. 4 The requests 4.1. In case 19-64, [plaintiff 1] requests the court, by order enforceable

Article 83(4)(a), Article 83(4)(a), Article 83(2)(i) and Article 57(1)(a), Article 58(2)(i), Article 83(3), Article 83(4)(a) and Article 83(4)(a) of the

original. Please refer to the German original for more details. W211 2223243-1 / 4E On behalf of the republic! The Federal Administrative Court recognizes through

"Main Labor Inspectorate" with ex. No.****; 2. Medical protocol LKK No.***; 3. Order to terminate an employment relationship; 4. Invitation to hand over the

AEPD, declared that they were profiling their clients, as defined by Article 4(4) GDPR, in two ways: firstly, in order to determine their clients' creditworthiness

provision of a service as described in the article 7, paragraph 4. Article 7, paragraph 4, has been drafted in a non-exhaustive manner by the use of the

of 15 March 2019, ECLI: NL: HR: 2019: 376, para 4.2.2, of 28 May 2019, ECLI: NL: HR: 2019: 793, para. 2.4.5. and of 19 July 2019, ECLI: NL: HR: 2019: 1278