Search results

Letter a GDPR). (Article 58 Paragraph One Litera a, GDPR). From this provision, taken together with Article 31 of the GDPR, Article 31 of the GDPR results

wrongly relied on the GDPR to redact documents. In this judgment, the Supreme Court clarified the relationship between the GDPR and domestic evidentiary

important to properly establish the data subject's identity. Indeed, Recital 64 GDPR states that the controller should take all reasonable steps to verify

Articles 57 and 58 GDPR. The NO DPA is the supervisory authority established in line with Article 51(1) GDPR to monitor the application of the GDPR on the territory

Letter f GDPR. It is true that the processing of personal data for direct mail can also represent a legitimate interest according to recital 47 GDPR. However

................ 19 Legal regulation ................................................ ........................................... 19 Penalty fee .....

uCOVID-19 warrants consideration as to whether the solutions provided for therein - in view of the undoubtedly continuing state of the COVID-19 epidemic

whether that data is correct and has been processed lawfully (see recital 63 GDPR ). The GDPR is the successor to the Personal Data Directive 7 , as implemented

85 GDPR, so that Chapter II (including Art 6 GDPR) to VII and IX of the GDPR do not apply. The regulation of § 9 DSG, which is based on Art 85 GDPR, is

to be in violation of Article 5(1)(a) GDPR, Article 6 GDPR, Article 9 GDPR, Article 12 GDPR and Article 13 GDPR and started a procedure to adopt corrective

12(6) GDPR. Moreover, in these cases, the use of regular mail does not facilitate the exercise of data subjects' right under Article 12(2) GDPR. Two data

of the GDPR by the controller, the DPA issued a fine of €12.100 in accordance with Article 83(4) GDPR, Article 83(5) GDPR and Article 83(6) GDPR. Both the

within the meaning of Article 4(7) GDPR. On the award of damages, the Court pointed out that, under Article 82 GDPR, any assessment of harm must include

of contract (Article 6(1)(b) GDPR), legal obligation (Article 6(1)(c) GDPR) and legitimate interest (Article 6(1)(f) GDPR) and determined that the controller

it has nothing to do with the matter that the reference to the Recital 64 of the GDPR to which the defendant refers, like those other subsequent references

violation of Article 5(1)(c)(e) GDPR and a prevailing legitimate interest of the defendant according to Article 6(f) GDPR. It must be noted that the judgment

accordance with Article 4(1) GDPR, according to the DPA. The Court of Appeal of Brussels held that, in accordance with Article 16 GDPR, the data subject has the

performance of a contract (Article 6(1)(b) GDPR) and for legitimate interest (Article 6(1)(f) GDPR). Article 6(1)(b) GDPR In its original draft decision, the

is also in line with recitals 146 and 75 of the GDPR. Recital 146 refers to the processing of personal data. Recital 75 describes, by way of example, risks

1 lit. c GDPR. It cannot be deduced from Section 256 IO that Insolvency data (at all) also based on other permitted circumstances Art. 6 GDPR may no longer