Search results

first of all It should be noted that the implementation of a time control system based on the fingerprint by the employer, must be informed to employees

the right fundamental to data protection which, in order to be effective, must be able to be controlled by supervisory authorities, in particular through

amount of the penalty to be applied must be expressly determined. da to impose the interested party in order, as it seems to be deduced from the Proposed

of could be identified. To the extent of these findings, however, the complaint proves to be partially justified: First of all, it should be noted that

gap" by the witness S. It was to be assumed that the defendant had already been informed of the security gap. It was to be assumed that the defendant had

should always be respected and only the data that is necessary to achieve the purpose should be processed. However, this information must be adequately protected

that the requests of the person concerned to exercise his rights be complied with. It must be noted that the decision is not final and the controller may still

means, the information will be provided by electronic means when possible, unless the interested party requests that it be provided otherwise. 4. If the

management. The processing of personal data must be directly related to the goal to be achieved: the goal must be examined with a precise, complex and fact-based

Supreme Court about the right to be forgotten. The DPA made the following observations. Firstly, the right to be forgotten can be found in Article 17 GDPR and

it may be done at any time prior to the resolution. On In this case, if both reductions should be applied, the amount of the penalty would be established

request The investigation report will be forwarded to the Inspection Service on October 29, 2018. The complainant will be notified on October 29, 2018. same

which may be submitted. In that regard, the applicant refers to the text of Article 21(1) of the GDPR, which states that requets for removal can be made "at

the amount of the sanction to be imposed inIn the present case, it is considered that the sanction to be imposed should be adjusted according towith the

shall be deleted within a reasonable time time after the end of the employment relationship. The starting point according to the provision must be that

complaint of 1 February 2016 is to be dismissed as unfounded to the extent challenged and part 2. is therefore to be set aside without substitution. B)

data processing should be collected, data should not be deleted on the basis of the presumed request, nor should the request be specified. (10) In the

identity of the data subject be provided. 7. The information to be provided to data subjects under Articles 13 and 14 may be transmitted in combination with

infringement fee should be imposed for breach of the aforementioned provisions, and if a fee is to be imposed, how large the fee should be. It follows from Article

the amount of the sanction to be imposed in In the present case, it is considered that the sanction to be imposed should be adjusted according to with the