Search results

personal data from Article 9 GDPR. According to the AEPD, even if the controller may had relied on the exemption on Article 9 GDPR(2)(f), since the data

free copy (see below (b)) is neither by Article 15 (4) GDPR (see below (c)) nor by Article 12 (5) sentence 2 GDPR excluded (see below (d)). The claim is

City wished to rely on Articles 6(1)(e) and 9(1)(g) GDPR. Under Article 6(3) GDPR, reliance on Article 6(1)(e) GDPR as a legal basis for processing must

communicate data relating to the plaintiff himself. In accordance with Article 6(1)(c) GDPR, this data processing in form of a data transfer could be considered

of article 80.1.a) of the LGT, by motivating him in a generic way. 3. Disagreement with the application of the aggravating factor of article 80.1.c) of

violation of the provisions of article 5.1 c) of the article 5.1 c) of the RGPD, which implies an infringement typified in article 83.5 a) of the RGPD, which

has not violated the article 15 of the GDPR, infringement typified in article 83.5 a) of the GDPR. IV. Secondly, article 32 of the GDPR "Security of treatment"

the meaning of Article 57 (1) (f) GDPR. The submission from December 2017 should not be regarded as a complaint in this sense, as the GDPR was not yet applicable

According to Article 12 (1) GDPR, a controller must only take "appropriate measures" so that the notification obligation pursuant to Article 15 GDPR is fulfilled

the right to portability of the data; c) when the treatment is based on article 6, paragraph 1, letter a), or article 9, paragraph 2, letter a), the existence

the LPBCFT before the TGSS. III Article 6.1 of the GDPR According to article 6 of the GDPR “Legitimacy of processing: 1. Treatment will only be legal if

RESOLVES: FIRST: IMPOSE A.A.A., with NIF ***NIF.1, for an infraction of article 6.1.a) of the RGPD, typified in article 83.5.a) of the RGPD, a fine of €2,000 (two

irregularity. C. On the breach of Article 82 of the Data Protection Act 26. Under Article 82 of the Data Protection Act, transposing Article 5(3) of the

basis of consent, Article 6 (1) (a) GDPR. In particular, Article 6 (1) (c) (legal obligation of the controller and Article 6 (1) (e) GDPR (public interest)

that Customer 1 violated Article 12 (1) and Article 13 (1) c) and (e) and (2) d) of the GDPR. 7. The Authority determined that Customer 1, by not deleting

this regulation in accordance with Article 57 (1) (a) GDPR and which has the powers in accordance with Article 58 GDPR. For this reason alone, there was

personal data breach to comply with Article 32 GDPR and by reference to the principle set down in Article 5(1)(f) GDPR. In particular, this request concerned

erasure under Article 17 GDPR. Moreover, the Court found that the plaintiff did not justify his reliance on Article 18 GDPR. As for Article 21 GDPR, the Court

time (e.g. EC Grand Chamber 28.06.2005, joined cases C-189/02 P, C-202/02 P, C-205/02 P–C-208/02 P and C-213/02 P, paragraphs 215-218 and the practice of the

for by Article 51 of the GDPR. 17. By Article 57(1) of the GDPR, it is the Commissioner's task to monitor and enforce the application of the GDPR. 18. By