Search results

532/1993. 13 In the decision of 29 March 2019, Ro 2018/02/0023, marginal no. 21 - 33, the Administrative Court held that requirements for the content of the persecutory

Customer 1 attached to his reply letter - the number of transferred records: 33,185. (iii) Duration of data management: based on the decision of the BM, the

notify violations of personal data, as is known, introduced by the articles. 33 ff. of the General Regulation on the protection of personal data 2016/679/EU

Article 5.1.2 of the Social Support Act, Parliamentary Papers 2, 2013/14, 33 841, no. 3, page 172 that this also involves accountability to the municipal

contested decision of the regional court Cologne from May 4th, 2023, Ref.: 33 O 311/22, the defendant goes beyond the claim awarded at first instance to

indicate the sale of business assets. A query HSB stock overview shows that 33 and 23 vehicles were sold in the years 2015 and 2016 respectively. At the

care insurance should concern. The complaint is accordingly restrictive. I 33 The declaratory application for 2) 34, which has not yet been specified for

envisaged in terms of transparency (see Article 19 of Legislative Decree no. . 33/2013, as well as "Guidelines on the processing of personal data, also contained

it is the “sole” controller, according to the information available to it. 33. On November 3, 2023, as part of his reaction to the minutes of the hearing

to receive such calls. As a result, 29 complaints were made to the TPS, and 33 separate complaints were made to the ICO. The ICO observed that Home2sense

processor (Y); (2) the fact that Y had a very low annual turnover (i.e. only 839.33 EUR for the year 2020) and; (3) the fact that Y had already ceased all processing

found a violation of Article 58(1)(a) and (e) GDPR and imposed a fine of PLN 33,012 (€7,000). Share your comments here! Share blogs or news articles here

ruling by the DPA and was fined € 800,000 for violations of Articles 28(2) and 33(2) GDPR. Share blogs or news articles here! The decision below is a machine

of Articles 5, 6 (1), 9 (1) and 31 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 33 (1) (b), (l), (m) of Law 125 (I) / 2018. My ex-appraisal (reasoning) is set

Article 6(1)(f) GDPR Article 101 TFEU Article 56 TFEU § 1004 BGB § 19 GWB § 33 GWB § 823 BGB Decided: 30.11.2021 Published: 30.11.2021 Parties: German Football

(cf. Data Protection in Bavaria, 29 AL June 2018, Art. 24 BayDSG margin no. 33 et seq.) According to this, the references to video surveillance of the K

concepts of responsible of processing and processing in the GDPR, version 2.0, p. 33, § 88. Decision 16//2023 – 4/9 consultations for private purposes carried

causality has not been changed. § 33 DSG 2000 contained a clear reversal of the burden of proof (only) for fault. § Article 33.3 of the DSG 2000 read "(3) The

with Article 18(1)(d) GDPR. However, on September 29, 2020, 7:32 a.m. and 7:33 a.m., the applicant was again sent e-mail messages with location information

device by the constituted a personal data breach within the meaning of section 33 DPA 2018. 29. Furthermore, the Commissioner is of the view that the sixth