Search results

provided for in Article 83 of the PGRD and having regard to the assessment factors listed in Article 83.2. of the RGPD, a reprimand (Article 100 § 1, 5° LCA)

significant (article 83.2 b) Basic personal identifiers (name, an identification number, the line identifier) are affected, according to article 83.2 g) • •

(art.83, par.2 , letters b), d) and g) of the Regulation. On the other hand, pursuant to letters a) and c) of the aforementioned art. 83, par. 2, it was

to Articles 58, paragraph 2, letter i) and 83 of the RGPD and Article 166 of the Code, has the corrective power to "impose a pecuniary administrative sanction

established in article 83.2 of the RGPD2b) Basic personal identifiers are affected (name, identification number, line identifier), according to article 83.2 g) In

5(1)(f) and 32(1) of the GDPR. A. Order to Bring Processing into Compliance 6.2 In accordance with Article 58(2)(d) of the GDPR, I have decided to order

out a special test (on 21.2.2018) and after sending a communication (on 27.2.20218) on the account subject of the complaint using the account of a third

issued a warning to the city Council of Burgos for not having appointed a data protection officer, thus breaching Article 37 GDPR. After the GDPR came into

portability; (d) where processing is based on point (a) of Article 6(1) or point (a) of Article 9(2), the existence of the right to withdraw consent at

PROCEDURE against A.A.A., with NIF *** NIF.1, by the alleged infringement of article 5.1.a) of the RGPD, in accordance with article 83.5.a) of the RGPD. SECOND:

of Data, as a control authority, are established in article 58.2 of the RGPD. Between they have the power to direct a warning -article 58.2 b) -, the Power

significant negligent action (article 83.2 b) - Basic personal identifiers (name, surname, address) are affected, according to Article 83(2)(g) Therefore, on the

with NIF A95000295, for an infractionof article 6.1 of the RGPD, typified in article 83.5.a) of the RGPD, with a fineof 75,000.00 euros (seventy-five thousand

contact with the company excessive in regards to Article 5(1)(e) GDPR ? Is keeping a copy of the ID card of a data subject after its request has been met excessive 

for the alleged violation of Article 5.1.f) of the GDPR and Article 32 of the GDPR, typified in Article 83.5 of the GDPR. FIFTH: Notified of the aforementioned

provisions of the GDPR, whenproceed, in a certain way and within a specified period -article 58. 2d) -.In accordance with the provisions of article 83.2 of the RGPD

on a public notice board was in violation of Article 5(1)(f) GDPR. The claimant's personal data was written on a notification document posted on a public

lit. a), art. 58 section 1 lit. e) and f) and art. 58 sec. 2 lit. i) in connection with Art. 83 sec. 1 and 2, art. 83 sec. 4 lit. a) and art. 83 sec. 5

IMPOSE Ms. B.B.B., with NIF *** NIF.2, for a violation of Article 6.1 of the RGPD, typified in Article 83.5 of the RGPD, a warning sanction. SECOND: NOTIFY

administrative sanction provided for in Article 83, paragraph 5, of the Regulation applicable, pursuant to Article 58, paragraph 2, letter i), of the Regulation