Search results

when terms are not defined in Union law, they take on an autonomous meaning, any definitions drawn from national law cannot be relied upon (Planet49, Case

cooperation of the supervisory authorities throughout the Union. The Board should act independently when performing its tasks. Recital 91: Conditions Necessitating

which can lead to confusion and subsequent errors. The case-law reflects both views. Case-law: The Norwegian Privacy Appeals Board (Personvernrådet) overturned

Protection Act 2017) as well as Spain (Article 88 Spanish Data Protection Law 2007 provided for a similar obligation under their national law. See, Burton

05/2014 on Anonymisation Techniques, 0829/14/EN, 10 April 2014, p. 4, 8 and in general throughout the Opinion (available here). Eichler, in BeckOK DatenschutzR

consistency” in data protection law. This is particularly relevant given the fact that Member States may give effect to EU data protection law in ways which differ

consistency” in data protection law. This is particularly relevant given the fact that Member States may give effect to EU data protection law in ways which differ

data protection laws. Regarding the scope of the obligation to inform and advise, all Chapter IV of the GDPR, which covers the general obligations of the

Article 83 - General conditions for imposing administrative fines 1. Each supervisory authority shall ensure that the imposition of administrative fines pursuant

basis in Union or Member State law. This Regulation does not require a specific law for each individual processing. A law as a basis for several processing

Beyond, in International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 27 (2019), p. 102. See also Articles 4(11) and 7(4) GDPR, as well as Recital 43 GDPR

force. The national act which implemented the EU Directive was the Data Protection Act 1998. Subsequently, when the General Data Protection Regulation

(DSG), Federal Law Gazette I No. 165/1999, as amended; Section 68(2) of the General Administrative Procedure Act 1991 (AVG), Federal Law Gazette 51/1991, as

French law, in particular those which transpose the ePrivacy directive. Consequently, the case law of the CJEU on the application of Article 4 of the former

"The Data Protection Act" (Dataskyddslagen). The age of consent in Sweden is 13 years following § 4 of the Data Protection Act. Under Chapter 3 § 3 number

with Articles 5(1)(c), 6(1); 13(1)(c), 13(1)(e). and 13.2. a)AVG - on the grand of art. 101 of the WOG, an administrative fee of 10,000. EUR as a result

Federal Administrative Court Decision date 09.08.2021 Business number W211 2222613-2 Saying W211 2222613-2/12E DECISION The Federal Administrative Court

that the provision of Section 13, subsection 2 of the Act on the Status and Rights of the Patient (785/1992, Patient Act) requires that the registered

console for G-suite. 4. Justification for the Danish Data Protection Agency's decision 4.1 General It follows from the Public Schools Act, section 2, subsection

decision. Administrative penalty fee According to Section 24 of the Data Protection Act, the administrative fine stipulated in Article 83 of the General Data