Search results

no allegation has been received any by the claimed party. Article 64.2.f) of the LPACAP - provision of which the claimed party was informed in the agreement

in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

set out in the Article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015 of 1 October on Administrative Procedure Commonwealth of Independent States (LPACAP). In accordance with Article

out in the Article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015 of 1 October on Administrative Procedure Commonwealth of Independent States (hereinafter LPACAP). In accordance

in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

out in Article 64.2(f) of Law 39/2015 of 1 October on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administration (hereinafter LPACAP). In accordance

of the foregoing and in accordance with the provisions of article 64.2.f) of the LPACAP, the agreement to initiate PS / 00227/2020 is considered Pro- Resolution

the top of this document. Likewise, in accordance with articles 64.2.f) and 85 of the LPACAP, you are informed that, if it does not make allegations in time

articles 63 and 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (in hereinafter, LPACAP), for the alleged

in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). C / Jorge

in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

in the article64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of thePublic Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP).C / Jorge Juan

established in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

in the Article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on Administrative Procedure Common of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

articles 63 and 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (in hereinafter, LPACAP), for the alleged

for in Article 64(2)(f) of Law 39/2015 of 1 October on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administration (hereinafter LPACAP). In accordance

article 5.1.f) of the GDPR. V Classification of the infringement of article 5.1.f) of the GDPR The aforementioned infringement of article 5.1.f) of the GDPR

as set out in Article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of 1 October, on the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administration (LPACAP). In accordance with