Search results
From GDPRhub
- Deely v Information Commissioner (category High Court (Ireland)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)appeal this decision at the Irish High Court, pursuant to section 42 of the 1997 Act. Did the High Court have the remit to address the decisions made by the3 KB (332 words) - 21:41, 11 April 2021
- EDPB - Binding Decision 4/2022 - 'Meta (Instagram)' (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)the Binding Decision. Please note: When describing Issues 1-3, it is necessary to explain the proposals in the Irish DPA’s Draft Decision, in order to468 KB (51,340 words) - 14:10, 30 January 2023
- Frankfurt am Main 8 März 2012 (highest regional court, second highest in German court system), the court considers a site where one can rank doctors according144 KB (23,058 words) - 18:48, 5 March 2022
- form of a common decision taken by two or more entities or result from converging decisions by two or more entities, where the decisions complement each127 KB (21,484 words) - 17:01, 12 December 2023
- This decision concerns the use of plug-ins from social networks such as Facebook in websites. The court considered the question of joint controllers and6 KB (492 words) - 13:09, 1 June 2023
- action against that decision in court. The Circuit Court, High Court and Court of Appeal all dismissed his claims. However, the Supreme Court allowed an appeal6 KB (766 words) - 21:17, 5 March 2024
- contradictory. Conceptual decisions of the competent federal legislator must not be distorted or even undermined by decisions of a Land legislator based25 KB (3,847 words) - 12:32, 31 January 2022
- Rb. Amsterdam - C/13/702849 / HA ZA 21-526, C/13/706680 / HA ZA 21-789 and C/13/706842 / HA ZA 21-794 (section TikTok Ireland: jurisdiction under the GDPR)controller's establishment in Ireland. The Court added that the controller's argument that the right to bring proceedings before the Court of the data subject's92 KB (15,064 words) - 12:26, 28 June 2023
- Regional Court, order of 9 May 2019 - 18 W 523/19 -; Dres-den Higher Regional Court, order of 5 April 2019 - 3 W 286/19 -; Stuttgart District Court, loc.10 KB (1,476 words) - 15:55, 10 March 2022
- Datatilsynet (Norway) - 23-114365TVI-TOSL/08 and 23-114359TVI-TOSL/08 (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)want to appeal the Court of Appeal's decision to the Supreme Court The Supreme Court is the appeal body for the Court of Appeal's decisions. Appeals to the113 KB (18,098 words) - 11:57, 13 September 2023
- Court of Appeal - (2021) IECA 53 (category Court of Appeal (Ireland)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)private.” 136. The Supreme Court in Irish Times Ltd. v. Ireland [1998] 1 I.R. 359 recognised the inherent jurisdiction of the court to direct that a case be136 KB (23,256 words) - 13:47, 29 April 2021
- plaintiff refers to the decision of the Irish data protection authority Y., the court is already not bound by such a decision and also does not share the63 KB (10,478 words) - 09:40, 15 February 2024
- (substantiated): 17 Datatilsynet's decisions upheld: 8 Datatilsynet's decisions amended or repealed: 8 Ratio of decisions changed: 47% Case processing time5 KB (427 words) - 15:48, 24 January 2022
- purposes . These two decisions (hereinafter, collectively, the ‘IE SA Decisions’) were adopted on the basis of EDPB Binding Decisions 3/2022 and 4/2022,346 KB (48,181 words) - 16:39, 12 December 2023
- GDPR. This Binding Decision concerns the dispute arisen following a draft decision (hereinafter, “Draft Decision”) issued by the Irish supervisory authority276 KB (38,206 words) - 09:46, 20 January 2023
- companies brought an action against the decision before the Higher Regional Court in Düsseldorf, Germany (the Court). The Court referred to the CJEU for a preliminary8 KB (1,231 words) - 08:22, 6 July 2023
- Garante per la protezione dei dati personali (Italy) - 9856694 (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)Guarantor in previous decisions (see provv.to 21/7/2022 n. 268, web doc. n. 9811271) finds confirmation in the ruling with which the Court of Cassation (see49 KB (7,758 words) - 15:44, 6 December 2023
- English original for more details. Adopted 1 Decision 01/2020 on the dispute arisen on the draft decision of the Irish Supervisory Authority regarding Twitter183 KB (30,819 words) - 09:50, 20 January 2023
- subject, represented by noyb, appealed this decision of the DPA to the administrative Court (hereafter the Court) to have the DPA's letter reversed or annulled58 KB (9,280 words) - 12:38, 28 June 2023
- judgment Schrems II, the European Court of Justice did not reject standard contract clauses which transfer tool. However, the court found that they are not binding131 KB (14,752 words) - 08:36, 5 July 2023