Search results

Hungarian original for more details. Language of document : Bulgarian Spanish Czech Danish German Estonian Greek French Italian Latvian Lithuanian Hungarian

translation of the Czech original. Please refer to the Czech original for more details. Fine imposed on the Ministry of the Interior of the Czech Republic in

here! The decision below is a machine translation of the Czech original. Please refer to the Czech original for more details. DECISION Chairman of the Office

here! The decision below is a machine translation of the Czech original. Please refer to the Czech original for more details. Control of the use of cookies

here! The decision below is a machine translation of the Czech original. Please refer to the Czech original for more details. Processing of personal data

a machine translation of the Czech original. Please refer to the Czech original for more details. 10 As 190/2020 - 39 CZECH REPUBLIC JUDGMENT ON BEHALF

of the Czech original. Please refer to the Czech original for more details. Posted on: 10/04/2024 Posted on: 4/25/2024 30 Cdo 3909/2023-174 CZECH REPUBLIC

authorities (Article 4(22) GDPR) were, among others, the Austrian, Belgian, Czech and Danish DPAs. After investigating the controller's processing practices

regulators have been the data protection authorities of Austria, Germany, the Czech Republic, Denmark and Norway. Justification of decision Applicable regulations

You can add opinions and guidelines here! You can add opinions and guidelines here! You can add opinions and guidelines here! You can add opinions and

here! The decision below is a machine translation of the Czech original. Please refer to the Czech original for more details. OFFICE FOR THE PROTECTION OF

personal data pursuant to Article 4(2) GDPR. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the Czech Ministry of Health made access to premises and events dependent on certain

essentially states in paragraph 59 of the Opinion, and as the Netherlands, Czech and French Governments state, such a legal analysis does not constitute information

Rights (European Court of Human Rights, Grand Chamber, case of Rohlena v. the Czech Republic, req. 59552/08, paragraph 28). The restricted panel considers that

authorities con- cerned have been the data protection authorities in the Czech Republic, Denmark, Ger- many, Finland, Norway and Poland. The complaint The

the Netherlands, Slovakia, Denmark, Poland, Sweden, Finland, Belgium, the Czech Republic and Hungary as well as the United Kingdom. Two other websites (spartoo

organisations, such as the umbrella organisation BEUC and the Norwegian, Swedish and Czech consumer associations. The complaint concerned the unlawful tracking of the

the website ***URL.1 is Also available for the following EEA countries: Czech Republic, France, Italy, Romania, Germany, Greece, Holland, Poland, Hungary

each as owner, to the competent data protection authorities of Belgium, the Czech Republic, Finland, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden, France

to the 3 States of the European Economic Area (EEA), namely Iceland, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia and Slovenia. Norway and Liechtenstein