Search results

registered office in W. purchased a receivable from (...) Spółka z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością S.K.A. with its registered office in W. A party to the loan

Protocoleptor Bożena Kowalska on the action brought by Mr C. v. A. K. and W. G. with the participation of the Public Prosecutor and the Ombudsman to protect

October 1966 - 2 BvR 506/63, NJW 1967, 195; judgment of 30 June 1976 - 2 BvR 435/76, NJW 1976, 1883; order of 14 July 1981 - 1 BvR 575/80). This therefore

Ms. S.P. gave the signature to the head nurse, K.R., and after that date the signature was with K.R. so that she could continue to update the vaccination

Borman, member of the single chamber, in the presence of Mr R. Grimbergen, Registrar. w.g. Borman w.g. Grimbergen member of the single chamber of the Registrar

Daalder, chairman, and mr. C.C.W. Lange and mr. W. den Ouden, members, in the presence of mr. B. Ley-Nell, registrar. w.g. descender chair The Registrar

Gundelach, members, in the presence of mr. A.M.E.A. Neuwahl, clerk. w.g. from Altena chair w.g. Neuwahl clerk Pronounced in public on July 20, 2022 280-973

that each party bears its own costs. This decision was made by Mrs. R.R.M. de Moor, J.W. van Rijkom and T. van der Valk and pronounced in public on 15 July

Vienna Higher Regional Court as the court of appeal of 9 December 2020, GZ 14 R 143/20g24, whereby the judgment of the Vienna Regional Court for Civil Matters

only provisionally (see BVerfG, Order of 19.10.2006 - 2 BvR 2023/06, juris, marginal no. 13, EuR 2006, 814).

ambassador sent by the government of ****, who had been the project coordinator for W*** for the first respondent since May 1, 2022 for a period of 12 months. The

referred to in Chapter IX, European Union law or theItpotr 0r,-0000r53sesê-00r,r,-00as-01,-0r-flL ffiJ Page 13 Brussels Court of Appeal - 20201 AR/II60 -

for customer service, product development and BU performance testing) and R. S. (assistant to the branch manager in Austria and data protection officer)

used A. S.à.r.l. as a subcontractor. The agreement between the third party and A. S.à.r.l. in implementation Article 28 GDPR allowed A. S.à.r.l. to disclose

gImkxOG4uaW1wb3J0Lm9yLnBhc3RlLmNvbnRlbnQiIDogIlR1byAvIExpaXTDpCBzaXPDpGx0w7YiLAogICJpMThuLmNob29zZS50ZXh0LmFsaWduIiA6ICJWYWxpdHNlIHRla3N0aW4gdGFzYXVzI

office in W. at Al. (…), President of the Personal Data Protection Office, finding a violation by H. Sp. z o. o. with its registered office in W. at Al.

administrative court dr S...the judge at the administrative court P...the judge R...and by honorary judge...honorary judge...on the basis of the hearing on November

Minister), consisting in the delivery to the addressee by the postal operator R. (...) of a damaged and incomplete correspondence containing personal data

authority data.nl Confidential/Registered UWV Board of Directors Attn. Mr.M.R.P.M.Camps PO Box58285 1040HG AMSTERDAM Date Unidentified May 31, 2021 [CONFIDENTIAL]

probability speaks in favour of success in the main proceedings as well (see only W.-R. Schenke, in: Kopp/Schenke, VwGO, 24th ed. 2018, para. 123 marginal no. 14