Search results

transparency), Article 12(1), Article 7, Article 13 and Article 14 GDPR, the corresponding GDPR recitals (32, 39, 42, 47, 58, 60, 61, and 72), as well are Articles

(Art. 6 Para. 1 lit. f GDPR). In this context, Art. 6 Para. 1 lit. c GDPR in conjunction with the PMG and Art. 6 Para. 1 lit. f GDPR relevant: The Respondent

was responsible for violating Article 33 GDPR, and issued it with a warning pursuant to Article 58(2)(b) GDPR. The AEPD did not find the former Secretary

which was considered a data breach and therefore a violation of Article 32(1) GDPR. The Police Force of Navarra (Spain) reported to the AEPD the fact that they

(AEPD) imposed a warning on a Spanish public notary for infringing Article 13 GDPR by not offering the claimant relevant information when obtaining a copy of

processing under the GDPR. The local authorities filed a complaint with the Spanish DPA against the complainant for an alleged violation of the GDPR by finding scattered

family privacy of citizens and the full exercise of their rights.” Recital 40 of the GDPR states that “For the processing to be lawful, the Personal data

violation of the GDPR? The AEPD held that the senders of the email violated the principle of data confidentiality under Article 5(1)(f) GDPR, by revealing

infringe the principle of confidentiality established by Article 5(1)(f) GDPR? Was there a personal data breach? The AEPD considered that there was an

infringe the principle of confidentiality established by Article 5(1)(f) GDPR? Was there a personal data breach? The AEPD considered that there was an

warning to Escuela Infantil (nursery school) for the infringement of Article 13 GDPR. The decision is the consequence of a complaint filed by a Spanish citizen

precautionary measure in accordance with Art. 21 GDPR and requested a suspension in accordance with Art. 18 GDPR. On August 25, 2020, he complained again about

article 4.1 of the GDPR, are a Personal data and its protection, therefore, is the subject of said Regulation. In the article 4.2 of the GDPR defines the concept

meaning of the GDPR, and such processing of personal data did not fall within the scope of the "household exemption". Therefore, the GDPR applied in full

according to Article 23 GDPR, restrictions of obligations and rights under Article 12 GDPR - Article 22 GDPR Article 34 GDPR and Article 5 GDPR, insofar as its

controller's conduct constituted a breach of Articles 5(1)(f) and 32 GDPR and Articles 123, 132 and 132ter of the Code. Contrary to what was claimed by the

Articles 6 and 13 GDPR? The AEPD decided to impose, for infringement of Article 6 GDPR, a fine of € 10000 and, for infringement of Article 13 GDPR, a fine of

79 GDPR in cases of an alleged violation of Article 15 GDPR or can such violation only be subject to a complaint before a DPA under Article 77 GDPR? Do

243. In order to strengthen the enforcement of the rules of the GDPR, recital 148 GDPR clarifies that penalties, including administrative fines, should

Same principles concerning fair data processing exist in the GDPR Article 5 and Recital 39 and the Irish DPA 2018. Share blogs or news articles here!