Search results

of Article 12 of the GDPR has been established. 2. On the breach relating to the obligation to respect the right of access (article 15 of the GDPR) 38

infringement (Article 83.2(a) AVG), in particular the persistence of the infringement of Articles 6.1, 17.1(c) and (d), 21.2, 21.3 and 21.4 AVG for a period of

decided to impose, for infringement of Article 6 GDPR, a fine of € 10000 and, for infringement of Article 13 GDPR, a fine of € 2000. In addition, the company

with NIF A95758389, for the alleged violation of article 5.1 f) of the RGPD,typified in article 83.5 a) of the RGPDSECOND: ORDER IBERDROLA CLIENTES, SAU

access (in relation to the parameter referred to in Article 83, paragraph 2, letter e), v. Article 29 Working Group for Data Protection, Guidelines on

and d) and article 83, paragraph 4, al. a), all documented regulation.-In addition, under the terms of article 83, paragraph 3 of the GDPR, the fine of

appropriate to impute a sanction to the party claimed for the violation of Article 13 of the GDPR typified in Article 83.5 of the GDPR. The sanction that

personal data exposed, thus breaching Article 32(1)(b) GDPR and Article 32(2), cf. Article 24. An employee in a municipal health care center had access

Norwegian DPA fined a municipality €409,768 (NOK 4,000,000) for breaches of Article 5(1)(f) GDPR, Article 24 GDPR and Article 32 GDPR after a serious ransomware

for a violation of thearticle 5.1.f), in relation to article 6.1 of the RGPD.The violation of article 5.1.f) of the RGPD is typified in article 83.5.a)of

proportionate and dissuasive. The provided for in Article 83 (1) of the Data Protection Regulation. Article 83 (2) of the Data Protection Regulation sets out

RGPD, when proceed, in a certain way and within a specified period - article 58. 2 d) -. According to the provisions of article 83.2 of the RGPD, the measure

proportionate and dissuasive. The provided for in Article 83 (1) of the Data Protection Regulation. Article 83 (2) of the Data Protection Regulation sets out

CITY COUNCIL, with NIF P2801500F, for a violation of Article 37 of the GPRS, as defined in Article 83.4 of the RGPD, a warning sanction. SECOND: TO NOTIFY

subjects infringes Article 6 (1) (a) GDPR. The AEPD fined the data processor in an amount of 4,000 Euro for the violation of Article 6 (1) (a) GDPR. Since the

imposed a warning sanction on Ayuntamiento de Mejorada del Campo for a violation of Article 37(1) GDPR and asked the council to designate a DPO within a month

accordance with article 83.4 b) of the RGPD, and article 74.k) of the LOPDGDD, with the concurrent circumstances in articles 83.2.a) of the RGPD and 76.2.b) of the

sphere of the complainant in the social context of reference (Article 83, paragraph 2, letter a) of the Regulation), as also documented by the legal steps

The Finnish DPA found a retail chain to have breached Article 5(1)(e) GDPR, Article 25(1) GDPR and Article 25(2) GDPR for its lengthy storage of purchase

sec. 1 and 2, as well as art. 83 sec. 1 - 3, art. 83 sec. 4 lit. a) and art. 83 sec. 5 lit. a) Regulation of the European Parliament and of the EU Council