Search results

controller was. Article 22 of the Danish Data Protection Act serves as a restriction of Article 15 GDPR based on Article 23 GDPR. However, Article 22 of the

portability of the data; (c) where the processing is based on Article 6(1)(a) or Article 9(2)(a) the existence of the right to withdraw consent in at any

video surveillance, could be based on Article 6(1)(f) GDPR, and complied with Articles 3, 24 and 74 ZVOP-1 and Article 38 of the Slovenian Constitution. During

that there was no breach of Article 32 GDPR. Thus, the CNIL imposed a €310,000 fine on the controller for breaching Article 6 GDPR. To grasp the notion of

processing carried out is in violation of Article 5(1)(f) GDPR, Article 25(1) GDPR, Article 32 GDPR and Article 35 GDPR. Especially, the controller cannot exclude

EU law provisions of Article 23(1) and (2) GDPR. The court first addresses the dispute as to whether Articles 15(3)(1), 12(5)(1) GDPR constitute an independent

regulated in articles 23 and 24 of the Law 40/2015, of October 1, on the Legal Regime of the Public Sector (LRJSP): “Article 23. Abstention. 1. The authorities

Based on 20 of 23 working days in the relevant period, this amounts to an amount of 20/23 x € 3,297.00 x 1.08 = € 3,096.31 gross in salary, 20/23 x € 4,110

information duty included in Article 13 GDPR. Is this a violation of Article 13 GDPR? The AEPD held that there had been a violation of Article 13. According to the

GG Art. 1 Paragraph 1; Article 2 paragraph 1 GDPR Art. 6 Paragraph 1 Sentence 1 Letter e; Article 18 paragraph 1 letter d; Article 21 paragraph 1 Tags: Toleration

subject exercise her right to access upon Article 15(3) GDPR. The data subject made a request upon Article 15 (3) GDPR to get access to her treatment Data from

violated Article 5(1)(c) GDPR, Article 25(2) GDPR and Section 29(4) of the Finnish Data Protection Act. As a result, and in accordance with Article 58(2)(d)

controller violated Article 5(1)(d) GDPR ("accuracy"), but a more natural conclusion would be to find a violation of Article 32(1)(d) GDPR ("adoption of adequate

defined in Article 4 No. 1 GDPR. I am of the opinion that the requirements of Art. 17 Para. 1 GDPR are met. You cannot invoke an exception under Article 17, Paragraph

Guiding Principles 1 Section 13 (1) sentence 1 TMG is superseded by the provisions of the basic data protection regulation. 2 Article 80 DPA does not contain

63 and Article 12(1) GDPR, the AZOP underlined that controllers should provide data subjects with all the information requested in Article 15 GDPR. However

finepublic, as indicated in article 77.1. c) and 2. 4. 5. and 6. of the LOPDDGG: “ 1. Theregime established in this article will be applicable to the treatments

deletion under Article 17 GDPR is required. Even in the event of a proper and expert repair, a balancing of interests under Article 6(1)(f) GDPR indicates a

cross-border processing within the meaning of Article 4, paragraph 23, of the GDPR. 33. Pursuant to Article 60(3) of the GDPR, the draft decision adopted by the restricted

party in these proceedings. D E C I D E : -------------- Article 1: The intervention of UNAFAM is admitted. Article 2: The requests of the Cercle de réflexion