Search results

In accordance with Article 80(1) GDPR, noyb is representing the data subject in Austria (“the complainant”). Pursuant to Article 4(23)(b), the processing

Administrative Court): - 2 - 1.1. In a written statement dated October 23, 2021, the complainant submitted a complaint pursuant to Article 77 of the General Data

17 (1) and (3) KSchG, as well as Article 1 (1) (a) subparagraph i of Directive 98/59 EC, the implementation of which is aimed at § 17 paragraph 1 sentence

too sick to work. 1 2See, among other things, article 4 paragraph 1 SUWI and the ZBO register of the Dutch central government. See article 2 paragraph 2 SUWI

sentito il Garante per la protezione dei dati personali, sono individuat[i] (..) i dati che possono essere riportati nelle certificazioni verdi COVID-19,

violation of the GDPR, in particular Articles 12 and 15. Pursuant to its powers under Article 58(2)(i) GDPR, and in accordance with Article 83 GDPR, they imposed

Art. 8 Para. 1, Para. 2 Sentence 1 TFEU Article 16 GG Art. 2 Para. 1 and Art. 1 Para. 1 BGB § 1004 paragraph 1 sentence 2 analogous GDPR Art. 2 Para. 2

portability, thereby violating Article 13(2)(b) GDPR. In light of the above, in accordance with Article 58(2)(i) GDPR and Article 83 GPDR, the AP considered

well founded. 1) The review procedure is permissible, in particular the threshold value pursuant to Section 106 (1) sentence 1 (2) no. 1 GWB has been complied

paragraph of Article 2, ZKme-1 (point a) of the third paragraph of Article 5, the first paragraph of Article 139, the second paragraph of Article 143 of the

item 1. Paragraph 1 and paragraph 2 Article 8 and. Article 9 Act no. 90/2018, cf. point a, paragraph 1 and paragraph 2 Article 5 and paragraph 1 Article

processing as per Article 5(1)(b), nor legal grounds as per Article 6. In sum, the DPA found that NIF had breached Article 5(1)(a), (c) and (f), Article 6, and Article

large number of data subjects, i.e. all the patients of the Company itself (Article 4(1), no. 15 of the Regulation and Article 83(2)(a) and (g) of the Regulation);

Analytics or Facebook Connect on websites in the EEA. In accordance with Article 80(1) GDPR, noyb lodged a complaint on 17 August 2020 with the Austrian DPA against

the requirements on how it should be provided under Article 12 GDPR, Article 13 GDPR and Article 14 GDPR. The court of appeal disagreed with the court of

Therefore, the DPA confirmed a breach of Article 5(1)(a) GDPR, Article 6(1)(a) GDPR, Article 7 GDPR and of Article 130 of the Italian Privacy Code for having

the principles of Article 1 of the Basic Law, i.e. the obligation of all state authority to respect and protect human dignity (Article 1.1 sentence 2 of the

Legal basis: Art. 12 Para. 1, Para. 2, Para. 3 and Para. 4, Art. 15 Para. 1, Art. 23 Para. 1 lit. e, Art. 51 Para. 1, Art. 57 Para. 1 lit. f, Art. 58 Para.

breaching Articles 12(1), 14(1)(c), 14(2) and 14(3) GDPR. In addition, Datatilsynet also issued criticism in relation to Article 5(1)(a) GDPR for the controller’s

in Art. Article 12 (5) GDPR applies here, i.e. whether the defendant has a right to refuse. According to the legal definition in Art. 4 No. 1 GDPR, personal