Search results

case, for the penalty of a fine provided for in Article 83(5) of the GPSD or for the penalty of a warning under Article 58(2)(b), recital 148 of Regulation

IMPOSE Mr. AAA, with NIF *** NIF .1, for a violation of article 12 of the RGPD, typified in Article 83.5 of the RGPD, a fine of € 1,000 (one thousand Euros)

associations even without legal personality" (see Article 2, Law 179/2017 which added paragraph 2-bis to Article 6 of Legislative Decree .lgs. 8 June 2001, n

12(2), 21(2) and 21(4) GDPR. Moreover, the DPA held that the controller violated Article 5(1)(a), 5(1)(c), 5(2), 6(1), 12(2), 21(2) and 21(4) GDPR. The

processing carried out is in violation of Article 5(1)(f) GDPR, Article 25(1) GDPR, Article 32 GDPR and Article 35 GDPR. Especially, the controller cannot exclude

violation of Article 5(1)(a), (b), (d) and (e) GDPR. Furthermore, there was no legal basis for these processing operations under Article 6(1) GDPR. The DPA

procedure to the claimed, by thealleged violation of Article 5.1.c) of the GDPR, typified in Article 83.5 of theRGPD. FIFTH: Consulted the database of this

the criminal sanction referred to in Article 170 of the Code and the administrative fine provided for in Article 83(5)(e) of the Regulation shall apply;

the consent of the claimant is a violation of Article 6 GDPR, due to the lack of consent, in relation with Article 5 GDPR, that is infringed due to the

- 1) Art. 83 Para. 5 lit. a DSGVO 2) a) Section 52 para. 2 no. 6 DSG 2000 in conjunction with § 69 (5) DSG b) Art. 62 Para. 1 No. 4 DSG 3) a) Section 52

from a physician or other health professional, a hospital, a medical device or an in vitro diagnostic test. Recital 36: The main establishment of a controller

storage (Article 5.1.b, 5.1.c, 5.1.d and 5.1.e of the GDPR); - Violation of the principle of legality (article 5.1.a of the GDPR); - Violation of Article 10

rooms to a girl named A.A.A. " “That from the beginning A.A.A. knew of the existence of the camera at the entrance of the house and that works as a deterrent

essentiality of information. A mafia boss was caught after 30 years of hiding during a medical treatment in a private hospital. A newspaper published detailed

stroke a balance between freedom of information and right to privacy. Health data are sensitive data covered by Article 9 GDPR. According to Article 137 of

stroke a balance between freedom of information and right to privacy. Health data are sensitive data covered by Article 9 GDPR. According to Article 137 of

to"Process third party data" (art. 83.2 a) RGPD).- the intentionality or negligence in the infringement (art. 83.2 b) RGPD).For all these reasons, it is

according to Article 58(2)(d) GDPR. First, the AEPD established that the GDPR was applicable under Article 3(1) GPDR or, if not, at least Article 3(2)(a) GDPR

complainant to a credit rating without a legal basis under Article 6(1)(f) GDPR and for not adhering to the accountability principle as per Article 5(2). The DPA

(NAIH) found a violation of Article 15 GDPR and obliged a controller to grant a complainant access to his personal data. A complainant requested a controller