Search results

essentiality of information. A mafia boss was caught after 30 years of hiding during a medical treatment in a private hospital. A newspaper published detailed

stroke a balance between freedom of information and right to privacy. Health data are sensitive data covered by Article 9 GDPR. According to Article 137 of

stroke a balance between freedom of information and right to privacy. Health data are sensitive data covered by Article 9 GDPR. According to Article 137 of

to"Process third party data" (art. 83.2 a) RGPD).- the intentionality or negligence in the infringement (art. 83.2 b) RGPD).For all these reasons, it is

complainant to a credit rating without a legal basis under Article 6(1)(f) GDPR and for not adhering to the accountability principle as per Article 5(2). The DPA

(NAIH) found a violation of Article 15 GDPR and obliged a controller to grant a complainant access to his personal data. A complainant requested a controller

related, as per Article 5(1)(c) GDPR, and the lack of transparent information, as per Article 12 GDPR. The decision is the consequence of a complaint submitted

principle (Article 5(1)(c) GDPR). The decision is the consequence of a complaint submitted by a Spanish citizen stating that the defendant has installed a video

unlawfully. 2.4 Administrative fine Pursuant to Article 58, paragraph 2, preamble, in conjunction with Article 83, paragraph 4, of the GDPR and article 14, third

data; c) when the treatment is based on article 6, paragraph 1, letter a), or article 9, paragraph 2, letter a), the existence of the right to withdraw

to a slight degree (art. 83.2 b)RGPD).C / Jorge Juan, 6www.aepd.es28001 - Madridsedeagpd.gob.es Page 5 5/9Therefore, it is appropriate to propose a sanction

orrequest-related processing activities. ». 2.5. Article 32 - Processing security:2.5.1. In accordance with the provisions of Article 32 of the Rules of Procedure, which

breached Article 13 GDPR, Article 7 GDPR and Article 22(2) LSSI: there was no identification of the data controller, no possibility to give a separate

mentioned provisions, the HDPA issued a fine EUR 150,000 according to Article 58(2)(i) GDPR and Article 83(5)(a) GDPR. Share your comments here! Share blogs

information. IV Without prejudice to the provisions of article 83.5, sections a) and b), of the RGPD, its art. 58.2 b) provides the possibility of sanctioning with

access of individuals pursuant to Article 15 of the GDPR Article 15, paragraph 1, of the GDPR provides that the right for a person to obtain from the controller

controller did not have proof of consent, violating Article 7(1) GDPR. The controller also violated Article 5(2) GDPR as it never sent to the DPA the requested proves

is issued: RESOLVES: APPEAR: A D.D.D., for the violation of article 6 of the RGPD typified in article 83.5.a). REQUIRE: A D.D.D., in accordance with the

intervention Article 58 (2) (i) and Article 83 (2) state that the IMY has the power to impose administrative penalty fees in accordance with Article 83. the circumstances

DIRECT ESPAÑA, S.A., with NIF A26106013, for the violation of article 58.2 c) of the GDPR, typified in art. 83.6 of the aforementioned GDPR and 72.1.m) of