Search results

Gundelach, members, in the presence of mr. A.M.E.A. Neuwahl, clerk. w.g. from Altena chair w.g. Neuwahl clerk Pronounced in public on July 20, 2022 280-973

registered office in W. purchased a receivable from (...) Spółka z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością S.K.A. with its registered office in W. A party to the loan

ambassador sent by the government of ****, who had been the project coordinator for W*** for the first respondent since May 1, 2022 for a period of 12 months. The

Chamber),composed of D. Spielmann, President, V. Valančius (Rapporteur) and R. Mastroianni, Judges,Registrar: V. Di Bucci,having regard to the written part

office in W. at Al. (…), President of the Personal Data Protection Office, finding a violation by H. Sp. z o. o. with its registered office in W. at Al.

DECISIONS D A T U M 2 4 . 0 3 . 2 0 2 2 BUSINESS NUMBER W 2 5 3 2 2 2 6 2 6 1 - 1/8 E I M N A M E N D E R E P U B L I K ! The Federal Administrative Court has

place in disregard of the suspensive effect of an appeal, 29 cf. on this: W.-R. Schenke in: Kopp/Schenke, VwGO, 27th edition 2021, § 80 Rdn. 20. 30 This

administrative court dr S...the judge at the administrative court P...the judge R...and by honorary judge...honorary judge...on the basis of the hearing on November

probability speaks in favour of success in the main proceedings as well (see only W.-R. Schenke, in: Kopp/Schenke, VwGO, 24th ed. 2018, para. 123 marginal no. 14

This statement was made by mr. G.H.W. Bodt, chairman, mr. S.A. van Hoof and mr. M. Ichoh, judges, in the presence of R. van Diest, registrar. The decision

referred to in Chapter IX, European Union law or theItpotr 0r,-0000r53sesê-00r,r,-00as-01,-0r-flL ffiJ Page 13 Brussels Court of Appeal - 20201 AR/II60 -

Minister), consisting in the delivery to the addressee by the postal operator R. (...) of a damaged and incomplete correspondence containing personal data

[residence], APPLICANT for cassation, hereinafter: [person involved], lawyer: H.J.W. alto, against GOOGLE LLC, based in Mountain View, California, United States

business number W245 2252208-1/36E W245 2252221-1/30E Written copy of the verbal decision announced on March 31, 2023 I M N A M E N D E R E P U B L I K 

in the case between [plaintiff] , in Amstelveen, plaintiff (Agents: mr. E.W.S. Peperkamp, mr. S.E.A. Vermeer-de Jongh and mr. G.N.N. camp house), and Dutch

yet been conclusively clarified by case law (cf. Sesing MMR 2021, 544, 547 m.w.N. ). In the event of a dispute, the question of such a requirement of equivalence

case of monocratic jurisdiction, there is administration (Muzak, B-VG6 Art 87 R 2 f). According to Article 87, paragraph 2, B-VG, a judge is “in the exercise

lawyer's salary. This decision was made by Mrs. H.J. van Kooten, R.S. van Coevorden and R.W. Polak, and was pronounced in open court on 14 December 2021 in

detailed presentation can be dispensed with in this respect. 2.2.3 Regarding W 258 2216873, the Federal Administrative Court (BVwG) in its decision of 30

as: [defendant] , authorized representatives: mr. O.A. Sleeking and mr. A.W.D. lensink. 1. The process 1.1. The course of the procedure follows from the