Search results

et al. - the statement of defense of [defendant 1] et al. - the oral hearing held on September 23, 2020 - the pleading note of [plaintiff 1] et al. - the

interest owed by [applicants] et al. 2.8. On 1 October 2020, [applicants] et al. paid off the revolving credit. [applicants] et al. paid a total of €40,667.67

processing for [appellant sub 1] et al, e) to [appellant sub 1] et al in any other personal data relating to [appellant sub 1] et al that it processes. II. Order

of 3 November 1994 - 3 C 17.92 - BVerwGE 97, 79; Stuhlfauth, in: Bader et al., VwGO, 7th ed., § 113 marginal no. 34). If the plaintiff asserts - as here

contribute to increased compliance with the regulations. 5 By Skullerud et al. (2019), page 347, it appears: Contraceptive considerations dictate that the

order, as it does not specify the legal grounds that justify the decision (al. B) of paragraph 1 of article 615 of the CPC), has been overcome. In any event

the name of [applicant] et al. Course of the proceedings on appeal 1.1 By notice of appeal dated 12 March 2021, [applicant] et al. appealed against a decision

the statements made by [defendants et al.] are unlawful and therefore agrees with the Public Prosecution Service et al. The reasons for this are explained

Law: Article 4(1) GDPR Ley 16/2011, de 24 de junio, de contratos de crédito al consumo (law on consumer credit contracts) Type: Complaint Outcome: Upheld

riportato la notizia dell’avvenuto utilizzo dell’App Mitiga Italia al fine di consentire l’accesso al Mapei Stadium di Reggio Emilia per assistere all’evento calcistico

Article 38.4 g), of the aforementioned Law, which considers as such: “Use al- data storage and recovery when the information has not been provided or obtained

demands are made for guilt. In legal literature, for example in Skullerud et al., Personal Protection Ordinance, Lovkommentar, (per 1 May 2022, juridika.no)

general, establece el sometimiento de tales sistemas al marco legal y con los límites inherentes al mismo, ya señalados anteriormente. Ello implica que

defendants - insofar as summoned by each of them - and that TikTok et al. only meant TikTok et al. 1 The procedure 1.1. The course of the procedure is apparent

contribute to increased compliance with the regulations.8 By Skullerud et al. (2019), page 347, it appears: Contraceptive considerations dictate that the

Article 38.4 g), of the aforementioned Law, which considers as such: “Use al- data storage and recovery when the information has not been provided or obtained

organization or person and aimed at the promotion or sale of services, products (al without payment), as well as brands or ideas, addressed by an organization

contribute to increased compliance with the regulations.6 By Skullerud et al. (2019), page 347, it appears: Contraceptive considerations dictate that the

contribute to increased compliance with the regulations. 7 By Bergseng Skullerud et al., 2019, commentary on the Privacy Ordinance, page 347 it appears: Contraceptive

until 2019. On this date, Mr. X sold all of his shares to the S.A de droit al/emand Z and has ceased his functions as a director. Z then surrendered all