Search results

Page 11 11/14 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

Article 64(2)(f) of the C/ Jorge Juan, 6 www.aepd.es 28001 - Madrid sedeagpd.gob.es 14/16 LPACAP. In accordance with Article 85 of the LPACAP, if the sanction

established in article64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure ofthe Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP).C / Jorge Juan

in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

proposal of resolution, according to the established in the article 64.2.f) of the LPACAP. The sanctioning procedure will have a maximum duration of nine months

in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). C / Jorge

this sense, article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (LPACAP) - provision of which

conformity with articles 64.2.f) and 85 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Procedure Common Administrative of Public Administrations (LPACAP), by not carrying

articleArticle 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Administrative Procedure Co-common of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP).In accordance

in the article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

Article 6(1)(f), the legitimate interests of the controller or of a third party; and (d) where the processing is based on Article 6(1)(f), the legitimate

claimed party. Article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on Administrative Procedure Common Public Administrations (hereinafter LPACAP) -provision of which

alleged infringement of Article 5(1)(f) GDPR. Does the action of the defendant constitute a violation of Article 5(1)(f) GDPR? Considering the evidence available

the claimed party, in accordance with the provided in articles 63 and 64 of the LPACAP, for the alleged violation of article 6 of the GDPR, typified in article

in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

considered a proposal for resolution, as established in Article 64.2.f) of the LPACAP. The sanctioning procedure will have a maximum duration of nine months

Consequently, dated June 17, 2021, for the purposes provided in its article 64.2 of the LOPDGDD, the Director of the Spanish Agency for Data Protection agreed

articles 63 and 64 of Law 39/2015, of 1 October, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP), for the alleged