Search results

probably also Schiff in Ehmann/Selmayr Datenschutz-Grundverordnung² Art 9 Rz 2 f; aA Schulz in Gola Art 9 Rz 13; Weichert in Kühling/Buchner (Hrsg), DSGVO² Art

GDPR for the violations alleged by the plaintiff should not already be open (aa.), but in any case the defendant cannot be accused of a violation of the GDPR

The requirements for a claim to data information are met "on the merits" (aa.). However, the plaintiff is not entitled "to the extent" to the requested

does not exist because the challenged data processing is not unlawful. 15 aa) According to Art. 6 Para. 1 Sentence 1 DS-GVO, the processing of personal

foregoing and therewith also expressly taking into account the fact that CP & Aa medium-sized enterprise is in the sense of article 2a UAVA, taking into account

information on good faith according to Section 242 of the German Civil Code (BGB). aa) According to Section 242 of the German Civil Code (BGB), the debtor is exceptionally

falls within the jurisdiction of a court; Pursuant to Section 13 (3) (a) (aa), the Metropolitan Court has exclusive jurisdiction. A Kp. Pursuant to Section

[...] 2. Business premises: [...] e) in the case of gastronomy customers: aa) first name bb) name cc) telephone number dd) email address ee) table number

administrative files or parts thereof, four different disputes must be distinguished: aa) On the one hand, information on data protection law without cause - derived

applicable to the processing of personal data by the defendant tax office (aa.). The claim of the plaintiff, who is personally entitled to claim as the

entitled to claim damages from the person responsible or the processor. 18 aa) According to one view, Art. 82 (1) DS-GVO is to be interpreted broadly in

to compensation for pain and suffering from a violation of Art. 82 DS-GVO. aa) It can be left open at this point whether an interference with the right

damages under private law are independent of each other and have equal priority. aa) 49 By establishing the supervisory authorities, the legislator wanted to

decision at least withstands the legal examination in terms of the result. aa) According to Art. 6 Para. 1 Sentence 1 DS-GVO, the processing of personal

lawsuit is subject to the provisions of Art. Pursuant to Section 13 (3) (a) (aa), the Metropolitan Court has exclusive jurisdiction. A Kp. Pursuant to Section

plaintiff has a claim under Art. 17 (1) DS-GVO to their deletion Status. 16 aa) The plaintiff only raised an objection within the meaning of Art. 17 (1)

under the contract of use. She was not authorized to delete the posts. 76 aa) The defendant has no right to delete the plaintiff's disputed contributions

in Section 6 Paragraph 5 Sentence 1 of the WahlO is necessary. Paragraph 14 aa) The data to be recorded in accordance with Section 6 Paragraph 5 Sentence

v. 23.3 .2007 – 1 BvR 2228/02 – BayVBl 2007, 624). That's not the case. 7 aa) The administrative court correctly decided that the claim asserted by the

the legal basis of the decision. unjustified, pursuant to art. 151 of the AA, adjudicated as in the operative part of the judgment The case was examined