Search results

Therefore, according to Art. 15 Para. 3 Sentence 1 i. V. Art. 15 Para. 1 GDPR no right to release the test questions.2. The right to have the test questions provided

concerns of freedom of expression from Art. 5 Para. 1 Sentence 1 GG (BVerfG, decision of December 19, 2021 - 1 BvR 1073 /20 -, juris para. 26 with further

contributions is obvious (§ 10 sentence 1 no. 2 TMG ; Section 4 (1) no. 2 in conjunction with Section 3 (1) sentence 1, (2) sentence 1 nos. 2 and 3 NetzDG; BGHZ

Article 5(1)(f) GDPR. On 1 January 2024, the investigator for the Catalan DPA proposed a fine of € 3000 for the controller’s infringement of Article 5(1)(f)

17 (1) and (3) KSchG, as well as Article 1 (1) (a) subparagraph i of Directive 98/59 EC, the implementation of which is aimed at § 17 paragraph 1 sentence

Section 50 (1) BMG, Section 49 BWahlG, Section 6 (1) S 1e EUV 2016/679, Section 17 HKG ND, Section 85a HKG ND, Section 85a (1) S 1 HKG ND, Section 5 (1) S 2 DSG

'party affinities': 3.2.1 On the relevant legal provisions: Art 4 DSGVO, entitled "Definitions", reads as follows in no. 1 "1) "personal data" shall mean

violates Art. 16 Sentence 1 GDPR, Section 2 Para. 1 BMG and Art. 3 Para. 1 GG. He, the plaintiff, is entitled to a right to correction under Art. 16 Sentence

interested parties (see art. 4, paragraph 1, no. 4 articles 13, paragraph 1, letter f); 14, par. 2, lit. g), 15, para. 1, lit. h) art. 21, par. 1 and 35, paragraph

under US law - 16 - be without a doubt not with Art. 5 Para. 1 lit. f GDPR, Art. 5 Para. 1 lit. a GDPR and Art compatible. I.16. After being asked to comment

III of the GDPR, cf. Art. 12 (1) sentence 2, (3) sentence 1, Art. 15 (1) to (3) GDPR (cf. Nguyen in: Gola, DS-GVO, 2nd ed. 2018, Art. 58 para. 18). In the

parties within the meaning of Art. 6(1)(f) of the GDPR (see also Schantz in Simitis, Hornung, Spiecker, Datenschutzrecht, Art. 6(1) Rz 133 f, 137). Thus, it

seront communiquées [... ] "). In contrast to Art 15 GDPR, Art 13 Paragraph 1 lit e and Art 14 Paragraph 1 lit e GDPR does not state the data subject's

standard B-VG Art 133 Paragraph 4 DSG §24 DSG §4 GDPR Art 12 GDPR Art 15 GDPR Art 15 Paragraph 1 litc GDPR Art77 UWG §26b paragraph 1 B-VG Art. 133 today

Paragraph 1 Sentence 1 BGB, would contradict Section 307 Paragraph 1 Sentence 1, Paragraph 2 No. 1 BGB in conjunction with Article 5 Paragraph 1 Letter a)

dismissed as unfounded. Legal bases: Art. 3, Art. 4, Art. 5, Art. 17, Art. 51 Para. 1, Art. 57 Para. 1 lit. f and Art. 77 Para. 1 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (

Paragraph 24(1) and (1) and (2) of the B-VG. 5 DSG as amended, with the provisos that part 1. of the ruling concerning the data protection complaint of 1 February

to To 1): € 1.200,00 To 2): € 300,00 To 3): € 300,00 . . . In total: € 1.800 To 1): 3 days To 2): 1 day To 3): 1 day ... In total: 5 days Ad 1): Art. 83

Section 1 (1) DSG can therefore not be assumed (RS0130870). 3.2.1. On the legality of the publication of the BF's data in the app Art 6 para 1 GDPR contains

sentence 1 VwGO). 53 The claim of the plaintiff is based on Art. 15 para. 3 sentence 1, Art. 12 para. 5 sentence 1 DSGVO in conjunction with Art. 5 para