Search results
From GDPRhub
- GDPR. This Binding Decision concerns the dispute arisen following a draft decision (hereinafter, “Draft Decision”) issued by the Irish supervisory authority276 KB (38,206 words) - 09:46, 20 January 2023
- purposes . These two decisions (hereinafter, collectively, the ‘IE SA Decisions’) were adopted on the basis of EDPB Binding Decisions 3/2022 and 4/2022,346 KB (48,181 words) - 16:39, 12 December 2023
- Garante per la protezione dei dati personali (Italy) - 9856694 (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)Guarantor in previous decisions (see provv.to 21/7/2022 n. 268, web doc. n. 9811271) finds confirmation in the ruling with which the Court of Cassation (see49 KB (7,758 words) - 15:44, 6 December 2023
- (substantiated): 17 Datatilsynet's decisions upheld: 8 Datatilsynet's decisions amended or repealed: 8 Ratio of decisions changed: 47% Case processing time5 KB (427 words) - 15:48, 24 January 2022
- English original for more details. Adopted 1 Decision 01/2020 on the dispute arisen on the draft decision of the Irish Supervisory Authority regarding Twitter183 KB (30,819 words) - 09:50, 20 January 2023
- rights, the court must put an end to this as soon as possible. Therefore, the court held that the data subject cannot be asked to wait for a decision through44 KB (6,903 words) - 11:10, 16 July 2024
- subject, represented by noyb, appealed this decision of the DPA to the administrative Court (hereafter the Court) to have the DPA's letter reversed or annulled58 KB (9,280 words) - 12:38, 28 June 2023
- DPC - Health Service Executive - August 2020 (IN-19-9-1) (category DPC (Ireland)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)patients’ personal data. Decision IN-19-9-1 was issued in August 2020 and Decision IN-19-9-2 was issued in September 2020. These decisions should be read in conjunction142 KB (23,134 words) - 15:51, 19 July 2021
- judgment Schrems II, the European Court of Justice did not reject standard contract clauses which transfer tool. However, the court found that they are not binding131 KB (14,752 words) - 08:36, 5 July 2023
- indeed fall within the material scope of the GDPR, a national court, including any referring court, is required to seek the precise source of the legal obligation82 KB (13,428 words) - 17:02, 6 December 2023
- French DPA. One of these decisions was the Conseil's decision of 28 January 2022 (Societe GOOGLE LLC and Societe GOOGLE IRELAND LIMITED). Territorial competence73 KB (11,864 words) - 17:03, 6 December 2023
- questions, neither to the Court of Justice nor to the Constitutional Court.7 107. Given the multiple reasons on which this decision to discontinue the case90 KB (14,531 words) - 09:35, 11 September 2024
- judgment Schrems II, the European Court of Justice did not reject standard contract clauses which transfer tool. However, the court found that they are not binding113 KB (12,773 words) - 15:20, 6 December 2023
- cases to come to similar decisions in the EEA. Further decisions are expected soon. For details see here and here. Another decision was published by the French108 KB (17,097 words) - 13:52, 12 May 2023
- theEDPB decision(s) andfoundadmissible, theGeneral Court/CJEUhastheopportunitytoinvalidatethedecisionoftheEDPB.Inaddition,andiftheGeneralCourt/CJEU were289 KB (33,568 words) - 15:00, 1 February 2023
- DPC (Ireland) - IN-19-7-6 (category DPC (Ireland)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)accordance with the case- law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (the ‘Court of Justice’) and the European Court of Human Rights’”. (Emphasis added)513 KB (85,155 words) - 13:25, 8 July 2023
- means. 75 Subject to review by the referring court, in the present case, the file available to the Court shows that by integrating the 'Like' button from65 KB (9,767 words) - 16:22, 6 December 2023
- parallel, challenged the final decision before an Irish court and requested that the Court annul the contested decision in its entirety or, in the alternative8 KB (1,160 words) - 14:25, 15 December 2022
- Berlin upheld the action; the controller appealed this decision before the Higher Regional Court of Berlin (Kammergericht Berlin – KG Berlin). This appeal11 KB (1,299 words) - 07:33, 17 July 2024
- precisely recourse to the Market Court", Court of Appeal Brussels, Market Court section, 19 th Chamber A, Market Court section, 2019/AR/741, 12 June 2019429 KB (58,279 words) - 09:12, 2 November 2022