Search results

Personal Data Act (2000) | Disputes Act (2005) §20-2 | The Personal Data Act (2018) §1, GDPR A4, GDPR A5 (1) Judge Thyness: Questions and background of

interest . Article 30 of the Data Protection Act 2019 sets exceptions in Article 9(1) GDPR, Article 15 GDPR, Article 16 GDPR, Article 18 GDPR and Article 21 GDPR

to a minor, following Article 5(5) UAVG. In all other situations, the age of consent is 16 years, following Article 5(1) UAVG. Pursuant to Article 43 of

given that Article 6(1), Article 5(1)(a), Article 5(1)(d), Article 5(1)(c), and Article 14 GDPR were infringed in connection to Article 5(1)(b), the AEPD

violated Article 13 (3) in conjunction with Article 62 (1) item 4 of the German Data Protection Act and, for the period prior to 25 May 2018, Article 52 (2)

pursuant to Article 30(1)(f) of the General Data Protection Regulation. II. for violation of the provisions of Article 5(1)(a), (e) and (f), Article 5(2), Article

Authority (BDPA Act). You can help us fill this section! In Belgium the GDPR is implemented by the Data Protection Act (2019). You can help us fill this section

(f), Article 5(2), Article 6(1), Article 7(1), Article 24(1), Article 25(1), Article 32(1)(b), (c), (d), (d), (e) and (f), Article 5(2), Article 6(1),

personal data, cf. Article 6 no. 1, the principle of legality in Article 5 no. 1 letter a and the principle of data minimization in Article 5 no. 1 letter

of the Data Protection Act, Datatilsynet supervises compliance with the general data protection rules contained in the General Data Protection Regulation

the data transparency (Article 5(1)(a) GDPR) and the data minimisation (Article 5(1)(c) GDPR) principles? Was the defendant required to carry out a data

of personal data, provided for in Article 23(1) of Regulation 2018/1725, the EDPS recalled that, under Article 5(1)(b) of Regulation 2018/1725, processing

fraud under the Computer Misuse Act 1990 and under section 55 of the Data Protection Act 1998 (DPA) and was sentenced to a term of eight years imprisonment

that the letter in question referred to Article 58(1)(a) of the GDPR and Article 5:16 in conjunction with Article 5:17 of the Awb does not make this any different

General Data Protection Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and the Data Protection Act (1050/2018). When deciding the matter, the Deputy Data Protection Commissioner

the field of the protection of the rights and freedoms of data subjects in the context of the protection of personal data, to lodge a complaint on their

DPA fined a company €38,800 for unlawfully disclosing personal data from a surveillance footage, thus breaching Article 5(1)(a) GDPR and Article 6. The company

old German Data Protection Act (BDSG a.F.). However, it ceased to apply with the introduction of the GDPR and the new German Data Protection Act (BDSG n.F

plaintiff has a claim to restriction of data processing under or by analogy with Article 18.1(a) DPA. Nor does such a "non liquet" entail a claim by the

Personal Data Act 2018 came into force and the Privacy Ordinance was implemented in Norwegian law. The tribunal agrees with the Norwegian Data Protection Authority