Search results

Scotland cooperated with the ICO; and the fact that HIV Scotland reported the breach to the ICO within 2 hours of the incident. The ICO then went to impose a

officers. AMEX has been registered 5 • ICO. Information Commissioner's Office with the InformationCommissioner's Office ("ICO") since 19 June 2006 (registrationnumber

cooperation with the ICO’s investigation. 4. Continuation of unsolicited calls after launching of investigation by the ICO. Thus, the ICO issued a monetary

prior consent to BCS to receive such calls. The ICO issued a fine of £200,000 for this violation. The ICO considered that the conditions for the imposition

company. It first came to the attention of the ICO in connection with this matter on 10 August 2020. The ICO received a complaint (the “Complaint”) about

when it was appropriate to open emails which contained personal data. The ICO recommends that Parkside take further actions in respect of its technical

from individuals. The ICO therefore decided to imposed a fine of €11600 on Global One for breaching Articles 22 and 23 PECR. The ICO concluded that the contravention

that attracts interest. The ICO also considered that the address of high profile people was disclosed as a result. The ICO highlighted that the breach

______________________ https://ico.org.uk/media/for-organisations/documents/1555/direc-marketing- guidance.pdf 8 • ICO. InformationCommissioner's ffice

unclear on their obligations, the ICO operates a telephone helpline. ICO communications about previous enforcement 17 • ICO. Information Commissioner's Office

old or under. Mermaids notified the ICO on the day it was told about this. The Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) considered that Mermaids processed

case organisations remain unclear on their obligations, the ICO operates a telephone helpline. ICO communications about previous enforcement action where businesses

EML was investigated by the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO). EML provided the ICO enforcement team with 7000 records of personal data (names, dates

subject of various complaints to the Information Commssioner's Office (ICO). The ICO therefore initiated an investigation into Papa John's direct marketing

Therefore, the ICO decided that the redacted information is exempt from disclosure on the basis of section 40(2) of FOIA. The test applied by the ICO under Article

calls resulted in a number of complaints to the ICO, which opened an investigation on 1 June 2020. The ICO found that ColourCoat contravened Regulations

had resulted in a personal data breach. It notified the same to the UK DPA (ICO) on the same day and stated, “attack had resulted in the encryption of civil

opt-out, which therefore lead the ICO to conclude that WBAC did not comply with the requirements of Regulation 22(3) PECR. The ICO also concluded that WBAC had

basis and provides a report to the ICO. In May 2020, upon analysing the monthly reports provided by Mobile UK, the ICO ascertained “that between 1 November

cited the challenges it faced to gather the information requested by the ICO. The ICO responded that some of the information, such as legal bases should be